Gender identity: a multidimensional analysis with implications for psychosocial adjustment.

By Susan K. Egan, D. G. Perry. Developmental Psychology, 2001

850 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/47605486e15232fa56a3fab9ebb4e9a0b71f77cf

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Gender Studies

Citations in the corpus

Integrating the Study of Transgender Spectrum and Cisgender Experiences of Self-Categorization from a Personality Perspective (2014, methodology): “In terms of Facet e (gender evaluations), Tropp and Wright (2001) developed an ingroup gender identification measure for adults and Egan and Perry (2001) developed a gender typicality measure for children.”
Mental health of transgender youth in care at an adolescent urban community health center: A matched retrospective cohort study (2015, neutral): “Gender identity refers to a person’s internal felt sense of self [2].”
Sex Differences in Emotion (2002, background): “Such an approach may also reinforce sex stereotypes, rather than empowering both men and women to transcend socialized limitations (e.g., Vogel et al., in press); and it is increasingly becoming associated with poor psychological adjustment (see Egan & Perry, 2001, for a recent example).”
Biosocial Construction of Sex Differences and Similarities in Behavior (2012, neutral): “Children also may feel pressured by peers and parents to conform to gender role expectations (Egan & Perry, 2001).”
On Motivated Role Selection: Gender Beliefs, Distant Goals, and Career Interest (2009, background): “Indeed, the motivational rewards of aligning with gender roles were illustrated even with elementary and middle school children: Feeling typical of and content with one’s gender were associated positively with well-being (Carver, Yunger, & Perry, 2003; Egan & Perry, 2001).”
Measuring Gender: Options and Issues (2010, background): “Egan and Perry (2001) developed a measure of gender identity that uses developmentally appropriate format to assess children’s perception of membership in a gender category, perceived compatibility with the gender group, pressure to conform, and attitudes toward gender groups more generally.”
How Investment in Gender Ideals Affects Well-Being: The Role of External Contingencies of Self-Worth (2005, methodology): “Although previous research has established the link between investment in gender ideals and poor psychological well-being (Egan & Perry, 2001; Carver et al., 2003), to our knowledge no research has established the psychological mechanisms by which investment is problematic.”
Gender Identity and Stereotyping in Early and Middle Childhood (2010, background): “Egan and Perry (2001) examined 4th through 8th graders, and the majority was European American, whereas Turner and Brown (2007) studied a wider range of children (5–12 years of age), and three-quarters of them were ethnic minorities.”
Towards causal benchmarking of bias in face analysis algorithms (2020, background): “Gender deserves a special mention: gender identity is often modeled as multi-dimensional [21].”
Self-Perceived Gender Typicality, Gender-Typed Attributes, and Gender Stereotype Endorsement in Elementary-School-Aged Children (2012, neutral): “Other research, however, indicates that self-perceived gender typicality is more strongly related to same-gender-typed interests than other-gender-typed interests (Egan & Perry, 2001).”
“I’m Not a Science Nerd!” (2018, background): “These items were initially developed to measure gender identity, specifically gender typicality, or how similar you feel to women or men (Egan & Perry, 2001).”