Multiple social categorization
By R. Crisp, Miles Hewstone. 2007
328 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Social Psychology, Sociology and Political Science
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/46e862ec9218c5659cb18d76c3b0997acc2e354d
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
- Galen Bodenhausen
- M. Gocłowska
- M. Hogg
- S. Stathi
- Rhiannon N. Turner
- Joachim I. Krueger
- Shenel Husnu
- Kirsty Labuschagne
In Social Psychology
- R. Crisp
- M. Hogg
- Rhiannon N. Turner
- S. Stathi
- David E. Rast
- D. van Knippenberg
- Dominic Abrams
- Shenel Husnu
In Sociology and Political Science
- R. Crisp
- Rhiannon N. Turner
- M. Hogg
- S. Stathi
- D. van Knippenberg
- Shenel Husnu
- David E. Rast
- Dominic Abrams
Citations in the corpus
- The challenge of leading on unstable ground: Triggers that activate social identity faultlines (2009, background): “Any individual has many different social identities that vary in terms of salience and importance (Crisp & Hewstone, 2007).”
- From social projection to social behaviour (2007, background): “Thus, perceived similarities between 1See Crisp and Hewstone (2007) for a review of research on crossed categorisation. self-judgements and group judgements are thought to reflect processes of depersonalisation and self-stereotyping.”
- From imagery to intention: A dual route model of imagined contact effects (2010, methodology): “It has been noted that this could produce a multiple categorisation effect (Crisp & Hewstone, 2007), so we would not advocate using this version in future investigations.”
- Can counter-stereotypes boost flexible thinking? (2013, background): “…this is indeed likely and consistent with the idea that when diversity disconfirms existing stereotypes, this is associated with more open and tolerant attitudes towards a wide range of groups (see Crisp & Hewstone, 2007; Crisp & Turner, 2011; Crisp, Hewstone, & Rubin, 2001; Hall & Crisp, 2005).”
- Social identity: The role of self in group processes and intergroup relations (2017, background): “…celebrate group distinctiveness, while simultaneously drawing attention to other nonidentitythreatening shared attributes or category memberships (Crisp & Hewstone, 2007) and encouraging greater positive contact between groups (Brown & Hewstone, 2005; Dovidio, Eller, & Hewstone, 2011; Vezzali,…”
- How Dual-Identity Processes Foster Creativity (2014, background): “First, cross-categorization research suggested that people can typically hold only two identities in working memory at any one time (Crisp & Hewstone, 2007), and this would mean that once two identities are already conflicted, the addition of a third identity would have a minimal impact over and…”
- Cracking but not Breaking: Joint Effects of Faultline Strength and Diversity Climate on Loyal Behavior (2015, background): “…are not aligned (e.g., a female subgroup with mixed age versus a male subgroup with mixed age), individuals’ perceived inclusion in, or dependence on, particular social subgroups will be weaker as subgroup identities are submerged (Crisp & Hewstone, 2007; Turner, Oakes, Haslam, & McGarty, 1994).”
- Prejudice reduction: what works? A review and assessment of research and practice. (2009, background): “Once battle lines are drawn, these interventions use one of four kinds of strategies for reducing prejudice between the two groups: decategorization, recategorization, crossed categorization, and integration—each of which has generated a subsidiary theoretical literature (Crisp & Hewstone 2007).”
- The social identity theory of leadership: Theoretical origins, research findings, and conceptual developments (2012, background): “Alabastro and colleagues’ more complete explanation is that this temporal change in attitudes was due to a shift in the group comparative context and an associated re-categorisation process (see Crisp & Hewstone, 2007).”
- Social Categorization and the Perception of Social Groups (2012, background): “…to more than one categorical identity at a time and, indeed, research on cross-categorization effects has examined exactly this sort of situation, in which the social perceiver’s attention is directed simultaneously to more than one social category (Crisp & Hewstone, 2007; Kang & Chasteen, 2009).”
- Social Identity Complexity: Its Correlates and Antecedents (2009, background): “With a few notable exceptions (e.g. crossed-categorization research; see Crisp & Hewstone, 2007; Urban & Miller, 1998), research on how multiple group memberships infl uence an individual’s intergroup attitudes and behavior has only recently begun to receive substantial attention.”
- Diversity in the person, diversity in the group: Challenges of identity complexity for social perception and social interaction (2009, background): “They could be used additively, as often seen in research on evaluations of cross-categorized targets (Crisp & Hewstone, 2007).”
- The Interpretation of Multiracial Status and Its Relation to Social Engagement and Psychological Well‐Being (2009, background): “Not only might individuals who identify with various racial groups perceive themselves as belonging to a more complex social category, identification with multiple racial groups may also entail unique social comparison referents and group cognitions (Crisp & Hewstone, 2007).”
- Intergroup emotions and intergroup relations. (2008, background): “The difference in religion is not erased, but shared gender provides common ground ( Crisp & Hewstone, 2007 ).”