Galaxies in a simulated ΛCDM Universe – I. Cold mode and hot cores

By D. Kerevs, Neal Katz, Mark A. Fardal, R. Dav'e, David H. Weinberg HarvardCFA, Umass, U. Arizona, Ohio-State. 2008

592 citations recorded by the source corpus.

We study the formation of galaxies in a large volume (50 h −1 Mpc, 2 × 288 3 particles) cosmological simulation, evolved using the entropy and energy-conserving smoothed particle hydrodynamics (SPH) code GADGET-2. Most of the baryonic mass in galaxies of all masses is originally acquired through filamentary ‘cold mode’ accretion of gas that was never shock heated to its halo virial temperature, confirming the key feature of our earlier results obtained with a different SPH code. Atmospheres of hot, virialized gas develop in haloes above 2–3 × 10 11 M � , a transition mass that is nearly constant from z = 3 to 0. Cold accretion persists in haloes above the transition mass, especially at z ≥ 2. It dominates the growth of galaxies in low-mass haloes at all times, and it is the main driver of the cosmic star formation history. Our results suggest that the cooling of shock-heated virialized gas, which has been the focus of many analytic models of galaxy growth spanning more than three decades, might be a relatively minor element of galaxy formation. At high redshifts, satellite galaxies have gas accretion rates similar to central galaxies of the same baryonic mass, but at z < 1t he accretion rates of low-mass satellites are well below those of comparable central galaxies. Relative to our earlier simulations, the GADGET-2 simulations predict much lower rates of ‘hot mode’ accretion from the virialized gas component. Hot accretion rates compete with cold accretion rates near the transition mass, but only at z ≤ 1. Hot accretion is inefficient in haloes

Subfields: Astronomy and Astrophysics

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/4afe175dab03bbebb9c1c04cdb6424fc191708da

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Astronomy and Astrophysics

  1. P. Hopkins
  2. L. Hernquist
  3. R. Dav'e
  4. R. Somerville
  5. A. Dekel
  6. Volker Springel
  7. E. Quataert
  8. D. Keres̆

Citations in the corpus