Modeling ring current proton precipitation by electromagnetic ion cyclotron waves during the May 14–16, 1997, storm

By Vania Jordanova, C. Farrugia, R. Thorne, G. Khazanov, G. Reeves, M. Thomsen. 2001

292 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Astronomy and Astrophysics, Molecular Biology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/46993c536f8bf3eecc44b75ffa8f6dc85ede0b2c

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Astronomy and Astrophysics

1. R. Thorne
2. Nigel P. Meredith
3. R. Horne
4. Y. Shprits
5. Wen Li
6. Binbin Ni
7. Jacob Bortnik
8. Danny Summers

In Molecular Biology

1. R. Thorne
2. R. Horne
3. Y. Shprits
4. Nigel P. Meredith
5. Binbin Ni
6. Jacob Bortnik
7. S. Glauert
8. Danny Summers

Citations in the corpus

• Global simulation of EMIC wave excitation during the 21 April 2001 storm from coupled RCM‐RAM‐HOTRAY modeling (2010, background): “This is in agreement with previous storm simulations with the RAM [e.g., Jordanova et al., 2001, 2007].”
• The Upgraded CARISMA Magnetometer Array in the THEMIS Era (2008, background): “…high density duskside plasmapause, occur most frequently and are the most intense during magnetic storms (Horne and Thorne 1993; Kozyra et al. 1997; Jordanova et al. 2001), but in the outer magnetosphere have an occurrence rate which increases with L towards the magnetopause and are present even…”
• Precipitation of radiation belt electrons by EMIC waves, observed from ground and space (2008, background): “[4] Left-hand polarized EMIC waves exist in the outer belt and usually precipitate ions with energies of tens of keV [Cornwall et al., 1970; Jordanova et al., 2001], generating the proton aurora in the upper atmosphere [Sakaguchi et al., 2007; Jordanova et al., 2007].”
• Kinetic simulations of ring current evolution during the Geospace Environment Modeling challenge events (2006, methodology): “These results are in agreement with previous studies [Kistler et al., 1999; Jordanova et al., 2001b] comparing modeled distributions with Equator-S/ ESIC and Polar/HYDRA observations.”
• The Electric and Magnetic Field Instrument Suite and Integrated Science (EMFISIS) on RBSP (2013, background): “The ion distributions can generate electromagnetic ion cyclotron (EMIC) waves (e.g., Cornwall et al. 1970; Jordanova et al. 1997, 2001b) and magnetosonic waves (e.g., Horne et al. 2000; Chen et al. 2010b), while the electron distributions can excite whistler-mode waves (e.g., Kennel and Thorne…”
• Global simulation of magnetosonic wave instability in the storm time magnetosphere (2010, methodology): “[4] Global ring current simulations have previously been used to study the excitation of whistler mode chorus [Jordanova et al., 2010] and electromagnetic ion cyclotron (EMIC) waves [Jordanova et al., 2001; Chen et al., 2010], both of which are of importance in radiation belts dynamics.”
• Resonant scattering of outer zone relativistic electrons by multiband EMIC waves and resultant electron loss time scales (2015, background): “…protons that are formed by the earthward ion convection from the magnetotail during geomagnetically disturbed periods [e.g., Cornwall et al., 1970; Jordanova et al., 2001; Zhang et al., 2014], EMIC waves preferentially occur in regions of high density either localized along the duskside…”
• Outward radial diffusion driven by losses at magnetopause (2006, background): “These waves are preferentially excited in the high-density plasmasphere, along the duskside plasmapause [Horne and Thorne, 1993; Kozyra et al., 1997; Horne and Thorne, 1997; Jordanova et al., 2001a, 2001b;Erlandson andUkhorskiy, 2001], during enhanced convective injection of ring current ions.”
• The occurrence and wave properties of H+‐, He+‐, and O+‐band EMIC waves observed by the Van Allen Probes (2015, background): “An expanded plasmapause overlapping with ring current hot anisotropic ions could therefore generate the EMIC waves located at these L shells [Jordanova et al., 2001].”
• Statistical analysis of relativistic electron energies for cyclotron resonance with EMIC waves observed on CRRES (2003, background): “> T k ) ring current (1–100 keV) protons, which are injected into the inner magnetosphere by enhanced Earth-ward convection during geomagnetic storms and substorms [e.g., Cornwall et al. , 1970; Kozyra et al. , 1997; Jordanova et al. , 2001].”
• Global morphology and spectral properties of EMIC waves derived from CRRES observations (2014, background): “…inner magnetosphere EMIC waves are generated by anisotropic medium energy ring current ions injected during storms and substorms [Cornwall et al., 1970; Jordanova et al., 2001] so that a measure of the ring current, such as the Dst index might also be expected to be a useful proxy for EMIC waves.”
• Timescales for radiation belt electron acceleration and loss due to resonant wave‐particle interactions: 2. Evaluation for VLF chorus, ELF hiss, and electromagnetic ion cyclotron waves (2007, background): “A source of free energy for EMIC wave excitation is the anisotropic distribution of low-energy ( keV) ring current hydrogen (H+) ions convected from the magnetotail [Jordanova et al., 2001].”
• Electron losses from the radiation belts caused by EMIC waves (2014, methodology): “While only a few models such as the Salammbô and RAM model include a MLT resolution [Jordanova et al., 2001], most models, including the BAS Radiation Belt Model, are based on data which is drift averaged over MLT. Shprits et al. [2009] have shown that MLT-averaged simulations can accurately…”
• Science Goals and Overview of the Radiation Belt Storm Probes (RBSP) Energetic Particle, Composition, and Thermal Plasma (ECT) Suite on NASA’s Van Allen Probes Mission (2013, background): “When boundary and initial conditions of these ring current models are well-constrained by measurements of the relevant physical parameters, studies (Jordanova et al. 2001, 2003, 2006; Zaharia et al. 2006) have demonstrated the models’ ability to accurately predict the global geomagnetic field…”