Kinetic simulations of ring current evolution during the Geospace Environment Modeling challenge events

By Vania Jordanova, Yoshizumi Miyoshi, S. Zaharia, M. Thomsen, G. Reeves, D. S. Evans, C. Mouikis, J. Fennell. 2006

167 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Astronomy and Astrophysics, Molecular Biology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/f3a27909c11d7458aa70a0f6a6c7ab4ced687be6

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Astronomy and Astrophysics

1. R. Thorne
2. Wen Li
3. Y. Shprits
4. Nigel P. Meredith
5. R. Horne
6. Binbin Ni
7. D. N. Baker
8. Jacob Bortnik

In Molecular Biology

1. R. Thorne
2. Wen Li
3. Y. Shprits
4. R. Horne
5. Vania Jordanova
6. Seth G. Claudepierre
7. Craig Kletzing
8. S. Elkington

Citations in the corpus

• The Electric and Magnetic Field Instrument Suite and Integrated Science (EMFISIS) on RBSP (2013, methodology): “Ring Current and Radiation Belt Modeling A newly-developed coupled ring currentradiation belt model (Jordanova and Miyoshi 2005; Jordanova et al. 2006, 2010a, 2010b; Zaharia et al. 2006, 2010) will be used as a powerful tool to understand the dynamics of energetic electrons and ions in the inner…”
• The Interaction of Successive Coronal Mass Ejections: A Review (2016, background): “The strength of the ring current depends mainly on two factors: (i) the electric field in which the particles drift as they travel inwards from the plasma sheet, and (ii) the density of the plasma sheet itself, since it constitutes the seed population (Jordanova et al., 2006).”
• Science Goals and Overview of the Radiation Belt Storm Probes (RBSP) Energetic Particle, Composition, and Thermal Plasma (ECT) Suite on NASA’s Van Allen Probes Mission (2013, background): “When boundary and initial conditions of these ring current models are well-constrained by measurements of the relevant physical parameters, studies (Jordanova et al. 2001, 2003, 2006; Zaharia et al. 2006) have demonstrated the models’ ability to accurately predict the global geomagnetic field…”
• Particle Dynamics in the Earth's Radiation Belts: Review of Current Research and Open Questions (2020, methodology): “…Field model, RAM provides the anisotropic pressure that calculates self‐consistently the magnetic field topology for the ring current (RAM) plasma (Jordanova et al., 1996, 1997, 2006; Zaharia et al., 2006, 2010; Jordanova & Miyoshi, 2005, Miyoshi et al., 2006; Jordanova et al., 2010; Welling et…”
• Dynamic evolution of energetic outer zone electrons due to wave‐particle interactions during storms (2007, background): “ions are convected into the plume [Jordanova and Miyoshi, 2005; Thorne et al., 2006; Jordanova et al., 2006 ].”
• Global simulation of EMIC wave excitation during the 21 April 2001 storm from coupled RCM‐RAM‐HOTRAY modeling (2010, methodology): “The RAM code is coupled with a plasmaspheric model [Rasmussen et al., 1993] that was developed further to use an arbitrary electric field by Jordanova et al. [2006] .”