Direct trajectory optimization and costate estimation of finite-horizon and infinite-horizon optimal control problems using a Radau pseudospectral method
By Divya Garg, Michael A. Patterson, Camila Francolin, Christopher Darby, Geoffrey T. Huntington, William W. Hager, Anil V. Rao. Computational optimization and applications, 2011
412 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Aerospace Engineering
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/4690f56feba2379759970101c1b89a2ee892f793
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Aerospace Engineering
- Anil V. Rao
- Michael A. Patterson
- William W. Hager
- Divya Garg
- David A. Benson
- Geoffrey T. Huntington
- Matthew Kelly
- Christopher Darby
Citations in the corpus
- A unified framework for the numerical solution of optimal control problems using pseudospectral methods (2010, methodology): “…methods using these sets of collocation points are the Legendre–Gauss–Lobatto pseudospectral method (Elnagar et al., 1995; Fahroo & Ross, 2001), the Legendre–Gauss pseudospectral method (Benson et al., 2006; Rao et al., 2010), and the Legendre–Gauss–Radau pseudospectral method (Garg et al., 2009).”
- AN OVERVIEW OF THREE PSEUDOSPECTRAL METHODS FOR THE NUMERICAL SOLUTION OF OPTIMAL CONTROL PROBLEMS (2017, neutral): “LetΛ denote theN by n matrix of Lagrange multipliers associated with the system dynamics (8), let ΛN+1 denote the1 by n vector of multipliers associated with the equation (11) for XN+1, and letμ be the 1 by n row vector of Lagrange multipliers associated with the initial condition.”
- Pseudospectral methods for solving infinite-horizon optimal control problems (2011, background): “Moreover, from the definition of λN+1, the following identity can be derived (see Garg et al., 2009, for the details): µ = λN+1 + N− j=1 wjTj∇xH(Xi,Ui, λi).”