Valuing environmental amenities using stated choice studies : a common sense approach to theory and practice

152 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Public Benefits, Private Benefits, and Policy Mechanism Choice for Land-Use Change for Environmental Benefits (2008, unknown): “If further precision is desired, a range of market or non-market valuation methods may be appropriate, depending on the types of benefits and costs being considered (e.g., Smith 1996; Bennett and Blamey 2001; Brent 2006; Kanninen 2007).”
Willingness-to-Pay for Alternative Fuel Vehicle Characteristics: A Stated Choice Study for Germany (2014, unknown): “Hence, the general methodological approach of the LCM is described briefly in the following, drawing directly from Swait (1994, 2007), Boxall and Adamowicz (2002), Greene and Hensher (2003), Bujosa et al. (2010), and Hess et al. (2011).”
Economic Analysis for Ecosystem Service Assessments (2011, methodology): “These methods are discussed in detail through a variety of reviews and guidelines see, for example, Barbier (2007), Bateman (2007), Bateman et al., (2002a), Champ et al., (2003); Freeman (2003), Hanley and Barbier (2009), Heal et al. (2005), Kanninen (2006) and Pagiola et al. (2004).”