Public Benefits, Private Benefits, and Policy Mechanism Choice for Land-Use Change for Environmental Benefits

By D. Pannell. Land Economics, 2008

295 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Valuation of ecosystem services from rural landscapes using agricultural land prices (2011, background): “As argued by Pannell (2008), cost-effective policymechanisms aim to encourage environmentally beneficial land-use change should depend on the relative levels of private benefits and public benefits.”
Does it matter who advises farmers? Pest management choices with public and private extension (2020, background): “…pest management choices have a direct impact not only on their own welfare, but on that of their neighbors and the public at large, extension services are crucial to steer pest management strategies towards overall welfare maximization (Fan et al., 2020, Pannell, 2008, Schnyder et al., 2019).”
Creating culturally sustainable agri-environmental schemes (2011, background): “(Gowdy, 2007), with the cost components including private and public costs (Pannell, 2008), transaction, public finance, and”