Environmental and Distributional Impacts of Conservation Targeting Strategies

By David Zilberman, B. Babcock. 2001

145 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, Management Science and Operations Research

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/45d9e5539cfedd5568338e150398ab9300fb9309

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Economics and Econometrics

In Management Science and Operations Research

Citations in the corpus

The role of deforestation risk and calibrated compensation in designing payments for environmental services (2008, background): “This arrangement, however, does not take into account the fact that preventing land from going into agricultural production may have an effect on prices of the corresponding agricultural goods, which may result in slippage between ejidos (Wu et al., 2001).”
Effects of Payment for Environmental Services (PES) on Deforestation and Poverty in Low and Middle Income Countries: A Systematic Review (2014, background): “We also took note of whether studies accounted for spill-over effects such as deforestation ‘leakage’ or ‘slippage’ (Wu et al., 2001).”
Habitat and Open Space at Risk of Land-Use Conversion: Targeting Strategies for Land Conservation (2006, background): “Wu, Zilberman, and Babcock (2001) further analyze output price effects and impacts on different interest groups that result from alternative targeting strategies for restoration.”
Show Me the Money: Do Payments Supply Environmental Services in Developing Countries? (2010, background): “Spillovers and leakage can affect the magnitudes of environmental and economic outcomes, and the effects will vary depending on the extent of spatial targeting of contracts (Wu et al. 2001).”
Payment for Ecosystem Services from Forests (2014, background): “CRP (Wu et al., 2001; Wu, 2000; 2005; Roberts & Bucholtz, 2005; 2006), we define two types of slippage: substitution and macro price effects.”
Paying for the hydrological services of Mexico's forests: Analysis, negotiations and results (2008, background): “The problem of leakage, or slippage, (Wu et al., 2001), was also carefully considered in design discussions.”
Economic Factors Affecting Diversified Farming Systems (2013, background): “In the United States, laws such Section 404 of the Clean Water Act of 1972 and Section 9 of the Endangered Species Act of 1973 require compensatory action if the statutes in the sections are not met.”
Cost-effective design of agri-environmental payment programs: U.S. experience in theory and practice (2008, background): “Therefore, understanding the relationship between environmental benefits andcosts is critical inestablishing cost-effective agri-environmental programs (Babcock et al., 1997; Wu et al., 2001).”
Climate-smart agriculture: smallholder adoption and implications for climate change adaptation and mitigation (2011, background): “In essence, the choice between “working lands” restoration projects and changing land use (to exclude all livestock) will be a function of the trade-offs between maintaining livelihoods currently, the discount rate and risk preferences, and the rate of increase in productivity from exclusion (Zilber”
When could payments for environmental services benefit the poor? (2008, background): “Following Wu et al. (2001), we assume that each unit of land generates a fixed amount of environmental benefits, but these benefits vary across locations.”