Show Me the Money: Do Payments Supply Environmental Services in Developing Countries?

By Subhrendu K. Pattanayak, Sven Wunder, Paul J. Ferraro. Review of Environmental Economics and Policy, 2010

694 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, Global and Planetary Change

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/24d077455899ef56f273e1668a8c3c2acb0cf50a

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Economics and Econometrics

In Global and Planetary Change

Citations in the corpus

Forest Conservation and Slippage: Evidence from Mexico’s National Payments for Ecosystem Services Program (2012, methodology): “Few previous studies directly evaluate effectiveness using a comparison group of properties to estimate what would have happened in the absence of the program (Pattanayak, Wunder, and Ferraro 2010).”
Payments for ecosystem services: A review and comparison of developing and industrialized countries (2013, background): “Thus, society fails to establish institutions that internalize the value of services provided by intact ecosystems (Pattanayak et al., 2010).”
Effects of Payment for Environmental Services (PES) on Deforestation and Poverty in Low and Middle Income Countries: A Systematic Review (2014, background): “Pattanayak et al. (2010) review theoretical motivations for forest-oriented PES and findings from eight quasi-experimental studies and 18 case studies, but do not apply the replicable search and synthesis methods of a systematic review.”
Only One Tree from Each Seed? Environmental Effectiveness and Poverty Alleviation in Mexico's Payments for Ecosystem Services Program (2015, background): “…households (Pagiola, Arcenas, and Platais 2005, Pfaff et al. 2007, Alix-Garcia, De Janvry, Sadoulet 2008, Bulte et al. 2008, Jack, Kousky, and Sims 2008, Zilberman, Lipper, and McCarthy 2008, Leimona and Joshi 2009, Pattanayak, Wunder, and Ferraro 2010, Pfaff and Robalino 2012, Pfaff et al. 2013).”
The Different Dimensions of Livelihood Impacts of Payments for Environmental Services (PES) Schemes: A Systematic Review (2018, background): “However, this assumption has seldom been assessed (Pagiola et al., 2005; Pattanayak et al., 2010) nor, more in general, has the link between well-being and environmental indicators (Cruz-Garcia et al.”
Forest Figures: Ecosystem Services Valuation and Policy Evaluation in Developing Countries (2012, background): “Pattanayak, Wunder, and Ferraro (2010) also identify many unresolved issues, such as the importance of preconditions (e.g., land tenure, full information) and ‘‘crowding out’’ of intrinsic incentives.”
What are the effects of nature conservation on human well-being? A systematic map of empirical evidence from developing countries (2016, background): “These hypotheses have shaped conservation and development practices on the ground giving rise to integrated planning strategies (e.g., focus by USAID on Sustainable Landscapes models), an expansion of incentive-based conservation measures, such as Payments for Environmental Services (PES) [35], and ”
Evaluating the outcomes of payments for ecosystem services programmes using a capital asset framework (2014, methodology): “Our approach builds on work by Wunder et al. (2008), Daniels et al. (2010) and Pattanayak et al. (2010) but, by adopting a CAF approach, introduces a new means by which PES programme management interventions can be systematically appraised.”
What Drives Deforestation and What Stops it? A Meta-Analysis of Spatially Explicit Econometric Studies (2014, neutral): “Further reviews of the effectiveness of PES on stopping deforestation are found in Pattanayak et al (2010) and Miteva (2012).”
Payment for Ecosystem Services from Forests (2014, background): “Pattanayak et al. (2010) thoroughly discuss the question of environmental effectiveness of avoided deforestation programs.”
Payments for ecosystem services and the fatal attraction of win‐win solutions (2013, background): “Since then, the application of payments for ecosystem services (PES) has boomed (Pattanayak et al. 2010).”