Cost-effective design of agri-environmental payment programs: U.S. experience in theory and practice

By R. Claassen, Andrea Cattaneo, R. Johansson. 2008

404 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, Ocean Engineering

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/34bf9593bcf3c853d37c4b8a5a9bbedaf6b6a0ab

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Economics and Econometrics

In Ocean Engineering

Citations in the corpus

Economic Factors Affecting Diversified Farming Systems (2013, background): “In cases such as this, targeting PES schemes for optimal ES provision is complex and costly (Babcock et al. 1997, Wu et al. 2001, Claassen et al. 2008), and there is a tradeoff between making programs more context-specific and efficient, and costs of implementation (Jack et al. 2008).”
The history of ecosystem services in economic theory and practice: From early notions to markets and payment schemes (2010, background): “…al., 2008; Zimbawe Frost and Bond, 2008 Bio prospecting Costa Rica Pagiola, 2008 Agro environmental measures European Union Dobbs and Pretty, 2008 US Claassen et al., 2008 Please cite this article as: Gómez-Baggethun, E., et al., The history of eco to markets and payment schemes, Ecological…”
Spatial targeting of payments for environmental services: A tool for boosting conservation benefits (2008, background): “While benefits and costs are widely acknowledged targeting criteria (e.g. Babcock et al., 1997; Ferraro, 2004; Barton et al., 2003; Claassen et al., 2008-this issue), they are not fully considered in most current PES schemes.”
Evaluating farmers’ likely participation in a payment programme for water quality protection in the UK uplands (2013, background): “Literature has addressed the design and potential operation of PES systems from theoretical and empirical perspectives (Antle et al. 2003; Claassen et al. 2008; Jack et al. 2008; Schlüter et al. 2009; Zabel and Roe 2009), considered the efficiency of alignment between payments and outcome delivery…”
Private Landowner Conservation Behavior Following Participation in Voluntary Incentive Programs: Recommendations to Facilitate Behavioral Persistence (2018, background): “In the United States, federal conservation programs can be traced to the Dust Bowl in the 1930s (Claassen et al. 2008).”
Market-based instruments for biodiversity and ecosystem services: A lexicon (2012, background): “Similar schemes are also developed in the US (Claassen et al., 2008).”
An institutional analysis of payments for environmental services (2010, background): “…et al. (2005); Corbera et al. (2007a); Kosoy et al. (2007) Wunder and Alban (2008); Muradian et al. (2008) — c) consider payments for biodiversity preservation— e.g.,Wunder (2006); Claassen et al. (2008);Dobbs andPretty (2008)— or d) look at combinationsof all the above — e.g., Pagiola (2008).”
Integrating Ecology and Economics in the Study of Ecosystem Services: Some Lessons Learned (2009, background): “Although the United States and other countries have a long history of paying for conservation (see, for example, Claassen et al. 2008), the recent interest in creating markets for ecosystem services has given the notion of payments for ecosystem services a new appeal and prominence in policy…”
Additionality and the Adoption of Farm Conservation Practices (2013, background): “Starting in 2002, the portion of funding for major U.S. Department of Agriculture conservation programs allocated to working-lands programs have increased considerably relative to land retirement programs (Claassen, Cattaneo, and Johansson 2008).”
Direct conservation payments in the Brazilian Amazon: Scope and equity implications (2010, background): “In developed-country PES, e.g. the US-based Environmental Quality Incentives Program (EQIP), subsidizing farmers' costs of regulation compliance has also not been uncommon (Claassen et al., 2008).”
The Devil in the Detail: A Practical Guide on Designing Payments for Environmental Services (2016, methodology): “Approaches proposed in the literature include (Wünscher and Engel, 2012): a weighted sum of standardized indices (Claassen et al., 2008; Pagiola et al., 2004), normalizing indicators to make indicators directly comparable (Wünscher et al.”