Entrepreneurship capital and regional growth
By David B. Audretsch, M. Keilbach. 2005
281 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, Management of Technology and Innovation
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/4587634029289bd859027f4dce6b9268a26c7082
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Economics and Econometrics
- David Urbano
- David B. Audretsch
- Sebastian Aparicio
- S. Müller
- Enrico Santarelli
- Martin A. Carree
- V. Rusu
- Ovidiu Stoica
In Management of Technology and Innovation
- David Urbano
- David B. Audretsch
- Sebastian Aparicio
- S. Müller
- Enrico Santarelli
- Martin A. Carree
- Marco Pütz
- I. Seidl
Citations in the corpus
- The impact of local and external university knowledge on the creation of knowledge-intensive firms: evidence from the Italian case (2014, unknown): “In addition, scholars unanimously agree that KIFs boost innovation and new job creation and thus play a fundamental role in regional development (Audretsch and Keilbach 2004; 2005; Piergiovanni et al. 2012).”
- Models of regional growth: past, present and future (2011, unknown): “The scale of plant entry in a region is linked to the amount of entrepreneurial 21 capital available, and this is linked to overall regional competitiveness and growth (Audretsch and Keilbach, 2005).”
- The rural growth trifecta: outdoor amenities, creative class and entrepreneurial context (2011, background): “Endogenous growth models have stimulated theoretical interest in local entrepreneurship, seen as a means through which knowledge once created becomes assimilated in the local economy (Audretsch and Feldman, 2004; Acs et al., 2005; Audretsch and Keilbach, 2005, 2006).”
- Entrepreneurs and Job Growth: Probing the Boundaries of Time and Space (2010, methodology): “Such patents normally occur in a maturing product (Feldman, 1994) and in large firms (Baumol, 2004). Whereas such innovations help industries grow and become more efficient, they rarely lead to groundbreaking products and industries. Nevertheless, Baumol suggests that the cumulative effect of increm”
- Challenges for spatially oriented entrepreneurship research (2011, background): “for the German districts (‘Kreise’, Audretsch and Keilbach 2005 ).”
- A progress review of entrepreneurship and regional development: What are the remaining gaps? (2016, background): “Entrepreneurs are key actors in this process as they introduce new technologies, creatively combine resources and commercialize innovations (Birch, 1979) and so create jobs and economic growth (Audretsch & Keilbach, 2005; Fritsch & Mueller, 2008).”
- What Kind of Entrepreneurship Drives Regional Development in European Non-core Regions? A Literature Review on Empirical Entrepreneurship Research (2013, background): “The econometric studies of Audretsch and Keilbach (2004, 2005, 2007) introduce a particular kind of social capital labelled “entrepreneurship capital”, which is “the capacity of a society to generate new firms” (Audretsch & Keilbach, 2005, p. 458).”
- Business risk management in the context of small and medium-sized enterprises (2020, background): “The secondary effects become evident not only in the improved economic indicators (purchasing power of the population, etc.) in the SME location (city, region) but also in the country’s macroeconomic indicators (Audretsch & Keilbach, 2005).”
- The Localization of Entrepreneurship Capital - Evidence from Germany (2007, background): “2 See e.g. Glaeser et al., 1992; Henderson et al., 1995; Henderson, 1997 or Ellison and Glaeser, 1997.”
- Creative industries, new business formation, and regional economic growth (2009, background): “entrepreneurialism in urban governance, and Audretsch and Keilbach (2005) a direct link between”
- The Nexus between Entrepreneurship and Economic Growth: A Comparative Analysis on Groups of Countries (2020, result): “This is consistent with the results of several other studies [15,20,23,28,43,44,53,54] which show that entrepreneurial activity based on innovation has a positive impact on economic growth.”
- Twenty-five years of research on institutions, entrepreneurship, and economic growth: what has been learned? (2019, background): “Other authors such as Aparicio et al. (2016a), Audretsch and Keilbach (2004a, 2004b, 2005, 2008), Bjørnskov and Foss (2013), González-Pernía and Peña-Legaskue (2015), and Iyigun and Owen (1999) assess the effect of entrepreneurship on economic growth through econometric techniques in a Solow-Swan…”