Promising approaches to address the needs of poor female farmers

By A. Quisumbing, Lauren E. Pandolfelli. 2010

678 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: General Agricultural and Biological Sciences, General Health Professions, Soil Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/454b47c110ffb3e344ee037c4350f87a3d61fcc0

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In General Agricultural and Biological Sciences

In General Health Professions

In Soil Science

Citations in the corpus

Engendering agricultural research (2010, background): “In a review of recent agricultural research and interventions geared toward women, Quisumbing and Pandolfelli (2010) identify a number of promising approaches to increase poor female farmers’ access to and control over productive resources in sub-Saharan Africa and South Asia.”
A review of empirical evidence on gender differences in nonland agricultural inputs, technology, and services in developing countries (2014, background): “In addition, guides, toolkits, and other resources on theory and practice of gender integration and promising programmatic approaches have been developed to streamline gender-specific agricultural development initiatives (Doss, 1999; Mehra and Rojas, 2009; Quisumbing and Pandolfelli, 2010; UNHABITAT”
Closing the Gender Gap in Agriculture (2016, background): “Women’s activities in agriculture are characterized by a global gender gap in vulnerabilities, access to resources, and productivity (FAO, 2011; Perez et al., 2015; Quisumbing & Pandolfelli, 2010).”
Entrepreneurship Amid Concurrent Institutional Constraints in Less Developed Countries (2016, background): “The presence of using storytelling within emerging economy entrepreneurship can also be observed in settings where microlending serves as a means of fostering local enterprise (Quisumbing & Pandolfelli, 2010).”
Gender, assets, and agricultural development programs: A conceptual framework: (2011, background): “…improving women’s participation, increasing the chances that women will benefit from the project activities, and working with men to change attitudes and behaviors that limit women’s opportunities in economic, social, and political spheres (Quisumbing and Pandolfelli 2010; Kristjanson et al. 2010).”
Mainstreaming Gender Sensitivity in Cash Crop Market Supply Chains (2014, background): “Moreover, women in poor households face particularly serious time constraints because of their various livelihood activities and childcare responsibilities (Quisumbing and Pandolfelli, 2009).”
The impact of rising food prices on the poor (2008, background): “Chief among these constraints are differences in access to inputs and services, and land and credit in particular (See review in Quisumbing and Pandolfelli, 2008).”
Enhancing food production and food security through improved inputs: An evaluation of Tanzania’s National Agricultural Input Voucher Scheme with a focus on gender impacts (2015, background): “…prominent role in agriculture, women farmers face additional challenges, including harmful gender norms, weak property and contractual rights, lack of initial investments for inputs, and overall unequal access to information and extension services (Quisumbing and Pandolfelli 2008; World Bank 2009).”
How resilient are farming households and communities to a changing climate in Africa? A gender-based perspective (2015, result): “These findings confirm evidence from other similar studies (Quisumbing and Pandolfelli, 2010; Friis-Hansen et al., 2012; Kristjanson et al., 2014).”
Gender and Agriculture : Inefficiencies, Segregation, and Low Productivity Traps (2013, neutral): “However, Quisumbing and Pandolfelli (2010) and MeinzenDick et al. (2010) find that extension visits are likely to remain the main mode of transmitting technology and information to farmers.”