Gender, assets, and agricultural development programs: A conceptual framework:

By Ruth S. Meinzen-Dick, Nancy Johnson, A. Quisumbing, J. Njuki, Julia A. Behrman, D. Rubin, Amber Peterman, E. Waithanji. 2011

192 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Gender Studies, Safety Research, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/88af53302c36bd1ddf45a8a2656da8ed4930a9a6

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Gender Studies

1. Ruth S. Meinzen-Dick
2. A. Quisumbing
3. Cheryl R. Doss
4. Marcel Fafchamps
5. Philip H. Brown
6. C. D. Deere
7. Paul Schultz

In Safety Research

1. Ruth S. Meinzen-Dick
2. A. Quisumbing
3. Nancy Johnson
4. H. Teklewold
5. M. Kassie
6. G. Kohlin
7. A. Mekonnen

In Sociology and Political Science

1. A. Quisumbing
2. Ruth S. Meinzen-Dick

Citations in the corpus

• Gender, assets, and market-oriented agriculture: learning from high-value crop and livestock projects in Africa and Asia (2015, background): “1) shows the links between assets and well-being while making clear that gender relations influence the constraints and opportunities that occur in each pathway (Meinzen-Dick et al. 2011).”
• Exploring gender perceptions of resource ownership and their implications for food security among rural livestock owners in Tanzania, Ethiopia, and Nicaragua (2015, background): “A number of authors have therefore argued that securing women’s rights to resources is a way to enhance welfare, growth, equity, and empowerment [7,8].”