International corporate diversification and performance: Does firm self-selection matter?

121 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Foreign experience and CEO compensation (2018, methodology): “To avoid confounding the impact of international diversification and industrial diversification, the number of industry segments is also included (Carpenter, Sanders, and Gregersen, 2001; Dastidar, 2009; Giannetti, Liao, and Yu, 2015).”
Institutional open access at home and outward internationalization (2015, unknown): “To overcome such a sample selection problem (Heckman, 1979), we adopted a two-stage estimation strategy to assess the impact of institutional open access, industry-level attributes, and firm-level attributes on a firm’s internationalization (Dastidar, 2009; Gao et al., 2010).”
Rapid internationalization and long-term performance: The knowledge link (2017, methodology): “After running it, and consistent with previous works correcting for this potential bias (Dastidar, 2009; Kim et al. , 2015), we calculated the inverse Mills ratio and introduced it in the second stage (panel-data GLS regressions) to account for self-selection.”
An anatomy of state control in the globalization of state-owned enterprises (2015, background): “Some literature makes a similar argument that firms’ strategic choices are endogenous and self-selected under institutional constraints (Dastidar, 2009; Gao, Murray, Kotabe, & Lu, 2010) and thus also follow sequential decisions (Tallman & Shenkar, 1994; Aharoni et al., 2011; Peng, 2012; Sun, Peng,…”