Nest predator abundance and urbanization

By David G. Haskell, A. M. Knupp, M. Schneider. 2001

101 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/43eea9e6e143d1a2fb2e1a9a1a4cacbf62cfbfb9

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Ecology

In Genetics

Citations in the corpus

Resolving the urban nest predator paradox: The role of alternative foods for nest predators (2011, background): “Clearly, urban areas can be a refuge from nest predation for some species in some years, but, overall, my data add to the growing consensus that urban areas are not always safe from nest predators (e.g., Jokimaki and Huhta, 2000; Thorington and Bowman, 2003; Melampy et al., 1999; Haskell et al., 200”
Urbanization and the Predation Paradox: The Role of Trophic Dynamics in Structuring Vertebrate Communities (2012, background): “In few studies have changes in the overall assemblage of predators been enumerated across a gradient of urbanization, but the limited research on songbirds suggests that their predators increase with urban development (e.g., Haskell et al. 2001, Sorace 2002).”
Invasion, Competition, and Biodiversity Loss in Urban Ecosystems (2010, background): “It has therefore been argued that predation pressure in urban settings should be higher than or at least equal to that in wildlands (Haskell et al. 2001, Sorace 2002, Beckerman et al. 2007).”
Credit or debit? Resource input changes population dynamics of city‐slicker birds (2004, background): “Cats may not be responsible for the majority of nest predation (Haskell et al. 2001), but may rather represent a high risk to adult birds.”
Escape behaviour of birds provides evidence of predation being involved in urbanization (2012, background): “Hence, our results seem to support the general observation that urban habitats pose low risk of predation (Richner 1989; Jokimäki & Huhta 2000; Haskell et al. 2001; Jerzak 2001; Antonov & Atanasova 2003; Lepczyk et al. 2003; Gaston et al. 2005; Sims et al. 2008; Sorace & Gustin 2009; Ibáñez-Álamo & ”
Habitat urbanization and its effects on birds (2015, background): “The fact that these predators reach the highest numbers in urban habitats (e.g. Haskell et al. 2001, Sorace 2002), yet their avian prey species also thrive there in great numbers, entail contradictory predictions on the importance of topdown control, leading to a predation paradox which seems to be…”
Predation rate on artificial nests increases with human housing density in suburban habitats (2003, background): “We did not attempt to quantify the relative abundance of different predators, but some potential avian and mammalian predators increase in abundance with human density (Haskell et al. 2001, Fleischer and Bowman unpubl.).”
NEST PREDATION IN AN URBANIZING LANDSCAPE:THE ROLE OF EXOTIC SHRUBS (2004, background): “Second, urban landscapes typically maintain higher numbers of nest predators (Matthiae and Stearns 1981, Oehler and Litvaitis 1996, Haskell et al. 2001).”
Birds in Urban Ecosystems: Population Dynamics, Community Structure, Biodiversity, and Conservation (2015, background): “While many natural predators avoid urban areas, at least during daytime, when birds are active (Tigas et al., 2002), other feral or domestic predators that inhabit cities in high densities, especially cats (Haskell et al., 2001), can affect bird population regulation.”
Causes and consequences of expanding American Crow populations (2001, background): “Indeed, predators that are adapted to fragmented and urban landscapes in the western U.S. may not compensate for the loss of native predators, in general (Tewksbury et al. 1998; Haskell et al. 2001).”