Invasion, Competition, and Biodiversity Loss in Urban Ecosystems

By E. Shochat, S. Lerman, J. Marty Anderies, P. Warren, S. Faeth, C. Nilon. 2010

569 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, Global and Planetary Change, Nature and Landscape Conservation

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/6b2285cd078c51abe9575aade4a4d09c1a1aa6d9

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Economics and Econometrics

In Global and Planetary Change

In Nature and Landscape Conservation

Citations in the corpus

Birds in Urban Ecosystems: Population Dynamics, Community Structure, Biodiversity, and Conservation (2015, background): “The above-described frameworks of Marzluff (2005) and Shochat et al. (2010) concerning the role of landscape structure, top-down, and bottom-up effects should be treated as starting points for future research on this topic, with the ultimate conservation goal of transforming urban environments into…”
Unwelcome exchange: International trade as a direct and indirect driver of biological invasions worldwide (2021, background): “, parrots) that subsequently escape, and also the higher international connectivity of large cities that facilitates unintentional introductions of alien species via ports and airports.(107,108) In the marine realm, urbanized maritime infrastructure associated with ports (e.”
Urbanization and the Predation Paradox: The Role of Trophic Dynamics in Structuring Vertebrate Communities (2012, background): “…safe habitat hypothesis)—the implication being that predation rates are also reduced in more developed areas (Gering Urbanization is radically and rapidly altering the Earth, leading to the formation of unique assemblages of vertebrate wildlife species in urban environments (Shochat et al. 2010).”
Habitat urbanization and its effects on birds (2015, background): “created conditions, thus are able to flourish in urban areas all over the world, while competitively exclude non-synurbic species (Shochat et al. 2010).”
Are urban systems beneficial, detrimental, or indifferent for biological invasion? (2017, background): “2013), and that NIS might benefit at the expense of natives within urban areas (Shochat et al. 2010).”
Non-native species in urban environments: patterns, processes, impacts and challenges (2017, background): “2013) when they replace regionally unique native species with a common set of non-natives (e.g., Wania et al. 2006; Godefroid 2001; Shochat et al. 2010).”