Is subsidizing entry an optimal policy

By Enrico Santarelli, M. Vivarelli. 2002

143 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/43cbfd03b325ce3b71d940d4b3884706da9903fa

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Economics and Econometrics

Citations in the corpus

Comparative analysis of firm demographics and survival: evidence from micro-level sources in OECD countries (2005, background): “A similar point is also made by Santarelli and Vivarelli (2002).”
Drivers of Entrepreneurship and Post-Entry Performance of Newborn Firms in Developing Countries (2014, unknown): “According to Schumpeter (1934), entrepreneurship is a driving force of innovation and, more generally, an engine for economic development (Audretsch, Keilbach”
Funding Gaps? Access To Bank Loans By High-Tech Start-Ups (2007, background): “…makers generally suffer from information asymmetries to an even greater extent than private financial intermediaries (de Meza, 2002; Lerner, 2002; Santarelli and Vivarelli, 2002); moreover they often are the target of an intense lobbying activity on the part of firms aimed at influencing the…”
High Growth Entrepreneurs, Public Policies and Economic Growth (2007, background): “Paper prepared for the Basque Journal of Economics (EKONOMIAZ) – special issue on entrepreneurship”
High-growth firms: Introduction to the special section (2014, background): “Shepherd and Wiklund (2009) found that employment and sales growth were only modestly correlated.”
Muppets and gazelles: political and methodological biases in entrepreneurship research (2014, unknown): “There may well be excessive entrepreneurship if public policy encourages market entry to the point that markets become thin, the profits of higher quality firms are reduced so their growth is constrained, and a market for lemons is created for investors (Santarelli and Vivarelli, 2002, 2007).”
To be born is not enough: the key role of innovative start-ups (2016, unknown): “…Dosi and Nelson 2013) is a key feature in the understanding the nature of start-ups, explaining the extreme variability in their chances of survival, their different post-entry performances and ultimately their diverse potential to affect economic growth (see Santarelli and Vivarelli 2002, 2007).”
The Skill Bias Effect of Technological and Organisational Change: Evidence and Policy Implications (2005, unknown): “As regards the former, while being stratified for smaller firms, MCC surveys attempt to include all manufacturing firms with more than 500 employees in all the waves (see Mediocredito Centrale, 1999, p. 5). As regards the latter, larger and older firms are more likely to survive (see Audretsch et al”
Dynamics of Science-based entrepreneurship (2010, background): “Failure rates are naturally high among SBEFs; public support may weaken the competitive selection process, subsidising inefficiencies and leading to distortion of competition (Holtz-Eakin 2000; Santarelli and Vivarelli 2002).”
Financing technology-based small firms in Europe: what do we know? (2012, background): “It has been stressed that subsidizing entry might distort the learning processes that drive the dynamics of start-ups, and result in a waste of public money (Santarelli and Vivarelli 2002).”
Entrepreneurs' human capital and the start-up size of new technology-based firms (2004, background): “Some authors (see for instance Holtz-Eakin 2000, Santarelli and Vivarelli 2002) question the rationale for public support of new firms.”