Comparative analysis of firm demographics and survival: evidence from micro-level sources in OECD countries

By Eric Bartelsman, S. Scarpetta, Fabiano Schivardi. 2005

515 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/9422d9a4ac00e8368b17aaee0dd7fa50356a6d21

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Economics and Econometrics

Citations in the corpus

Effect of credit guarantee policy on survival and performance of SMEs in Republic of Korea (2008, background): “, 1999), for Sweden (Heshmati, 2001), for Japan (Honjo, 2000), for Korea (Lee, 2003), and for OECD countries (Bartelsman et al., 2005).”
Defending Gibrat’s Law as a long-run regularity (2007, unknown): “also shown by previous studies (e.g., Bartelsman et al. 2005 ), industries characterized by rapid technological change and market experimentation are more likely to exhibit greater firm churning.”
High-growth firms and innovation: an empirical analysis for Spanish firms (2014, background): “5 %), exhibit greater capacity for job creation (Storey 1994) and improve productivity at country level (Bartelsman et al. 2005).”
Drivers of Entrepreneurship and Post-Entry Performance of Newborn Firms in Developing Countries (2014, unknown): “Indeed, entry and exit rates have been found to be positively correlated across industries in OECD countries (Bartelsman, Scarpetta, and Schivardi 2005) and in DCs (Bartelsman, Haltinwanger, and Scarpetta 2004 2 ).”
Corporate performances and market selection. Some comparative evidence (2010, background): “Approximately a half of the new firms in all countries for which there is evidence die within the first 5 years of life (Bartelsman et al., 2005).”
Muppets and gazelles: political and methodological biases in entrepreneurship research (2014, unknown): “They generated extensive economies of scale, scope, and speed, allowing them to become global oligopolies, so that today 25% of the US population work in firms with 410,000 employees and only 16.6% in small firms with 520 employees (Bartelsman et al., 2005; Haltiwanger et al., 2010).”
To be born is not enough: the key role of innovative start-ups (2016, unknown): “Indeed—in comprehensive statistical analyses—entry and exit rates were found to be positively and significantly correlated across industries both in OECD countries (Bartelsman et al. 2005) and in DCs (Bartelsman et al.”
Innovation and firm growth: Does firm age play a role? (2016, unknown): “Our result may be in line with Bartelsman and Doms (2000) and Foster and Krizan (2000) who point out that incumbents’ productivity growth plays a major role in industry productivity growth.”
Firm Growth : a Survey (2007, unknown): “In particular, they observe that “[a]fter 7 years of life, the average cohort of firms in manufacturing experience more than 60% growth in employment, while in European countries the increase is in the 5-35% range” (Bartelsman et al., 2005: 386).”
Creative destruction and regional productivity growth: evidence from the Dutch manufacturing and services industries (2008, background): “Although the turbulence rates are somewhat lower than those Bartelsman et al. (2005) found for the 1989‐1994 period, the rate in the service sector is still higher than in manufacturing.”