Interracial Interactions: A Relational Approach

By J. N. Shelton, J. Richeson. 2006

212 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Social Psychology, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/43ae575f3f2f213c15ebcdbee7139eaf97c8b97c

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Social Psychology

1. David M. Amodio
2. John F. Dovidio
3. S. Gaertner
4. J. Richeson
5. J. N. Shelton
6. Miles Hewstone
7. Peter Glick
8. P. Henry

In Sociology and Political Science

1. John F. Dovidio
2. David M. Amodio
3. S. Gaertner
4. J. Richeson
5. J. N. Shelton
6. Miles Hewstone
7. Peter Glick
8. Tamar Saguy

Citations in the corpus

• Intergroup anxiety effects on the control of racial stereotypes: A psychoneuroendocrine analysis☆ (2009, background): “By discussing race-related topics, issues of race were made salient to participants, which in turn likely enhanced their racial group identification (see Shelton and Richeson (2006) for a discussion of this issue).”
• College Sophomores in the Laboratory Redux: Influences of a Narrow Data Base on Social Psychology's View of the Nature of Prejudice (2008, background): “Over the past several years there has been a growing call to study racial issues as they happen dynamically, that is, as they unfold in interracial interactions ( Hebl & Dovidio, 2005 ; Shelton & Richeson, 2006 ).”
• Prejudice, stereotyping and discrimination: Theoretical and empirical overview (2010, background): “At one level this is seen in the relational approach taken to intergroup interactions by Richeson, Shelton and their colleagues (see Shelton & Richeson, 2006).”
• The Pitfalls and Promise of Increasing Racial Diversity: Threat, Contact, and Race Relations in the 21st Century (2018, background): “It is also essential to examine all of these processes more dynamically and relationally (Richeson & Shelton, 2007; Shelton & Richeson, 2006), considering, for instance, how members of different racial minority groups respond directly to increasing national racial diversity, as well as how they…”
• Another view of “we”: Majority and minority group perspectives on a common ingroup identity (2007, background): “The second set involves the different concerns that majority and minority group members have in intergroup interactions (Shelton & Richeson, 2006 ).”
• Understanding and Addressing Contemporary Racism: From Aversive Racism to the Common Ingroup Identity Model (2005, background): “Blacks (and other minority groups) may be vigilant to signs of bias and readily attribute these actions to intentional racism (Shelton & Richeson, 2005).”
• Implicit Attitudes and Discrimination Against People with Physical Disabilities (2011, unknown): “Thus, high levels of anxiety, which are characteristic of these interactions, can lead to disengagement from contact and the avoidance of future contact (Plant & Devine, 2003; Shelton & Richeson, 2006).”
• Threatened identities and interethnic interactions (2006, background): “Furthermore, just as behaviour management has been shown to have different implications for the self and for interaction partners (Shelton & Richeson, 2006), its effects on prejudice reduction may also differ for the self and interaction partners.”
• Reactions to Discrimination, Stigmatization, Ostracism, and Other Forms of Interpersonal Rejection (2009, unknown): “In an analysis of interracial interactions, Shelton and Richeson (2006) noted that having a stigmatized status and experiencing chronic rejection may shape meta-perceptions regarding others’ reactions and lead to wariness regarding interactions in which one might be devalued or rejected.”