Support for Rapid‐Growth Firms: A Comparison of the Views of Founders, Government Policymakers, and Private Sector Resource Providers

By Eileen Fischer, A. Reuber. 2003

257 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, Management of Technology and Innovation, Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/43898ee0d20334abadd50703fe2cd4da1f15531c

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Economics and Econometrics

1. E. Stam
2. Roy Thurik
3. J. Hessels
4. David B. Audretsch
5. Ross Brown
6. André van Stel
7. J. Levie
8. Erkko Autio

In Management of Technology and Innovation

1. E. Stam
2. J. Hessels
3. Roy Thurik
4. David B. Audretsch
5. André van Stel
6. J. Levie
7. Erkko Autio
8. Ross Brown

In Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management

1. J. Hessels
2. Roy Thurik
3. Erkko Autio
4. André van Stel
5. J. Levie
6. E. Stam
7. José C. Casillas
8. Ross Brown

Citations in the corpus

• On growth drivers of high-tech start-ups: Exploring the role of founders' human capital and venture capital (2010, methodology): “In this work we follow previous studies (e.g. Feeser and Willard, 1990; Fischer and Reuber, 2003; Barringer et al., 2005) in considering growth as an indicator of the business success of NTBFs.”
• Modeling the relationship between networking and firm performance (2007, background): “Florin et al. (2003) suggested that networking can provide value to members by allowing them access to the social resources embedded within a network; that is, networking can provide the means by which small and medium enterprise (SME) owners can tap needed resources that are ‘external’ to the firm ”
• High-growth SMEs versus non-high-growth SMEs: a discriminant analysis (2007, background): “1994 , Littunen and Tohmo 2003 ), and that rapid growth is an indicator of the firm's overall success (Fisher and Reuber 2003 ).”
• High Growth Entrepreneurs, Public Policies and Economic Growth (2007, background): “CONTACT: André van Stel, EIM Business and Policy Research, P.O. Box 7001, 2701 AA Zoetermeer, the Netherlands; Email: ast@eim.nl”
• Inside the high-tech black box: A critique of technology entrepreneurship policy (2014, result): “As other scholars have done these were used to triangulate the findings from the company interviews (Fischer and Reuber, 2003).”
• ENTREPRENEURIAL ECOSYSTEMS AND GROWTH ORIENTED ENTREPRENEURSHIP (2014, background): “Moreover, they are likely to benefit most from peer-based support (Fischer and Reuber, 2003; Mason and Brown, 2013) on account of the greater opportunities for experiential learning and tacit knowledge sharing.”
• The strategic management of high-growth firms:a review and theoretical conceptualization (2017, unknown): “The importance of employee compensation practices was visible in findings from a qualitative study of a Canadian business network whose members, all CEOs of HGFs, advise other network members and recommend consultants who had helped them develop and implement employee-shared ownership plans (Fischer”
• Contribution of Resource-Based View and Entrepreneurial Orientation on Small Firm Growth (2011, background): “Nº 1 (Año 2011), pp. 95-116 111 The results have some theoretical support in the literature (Johanisson, 1990; Fischer and Reuber, 2003; Ferreira, 2010).”
• In search of the drivers of high growth in manufacturing SMEs (2006, methodology): “Based on existing definitions of high growth, we adopted a more stringent approach than that put forward by Fischer and Reuber (2003).”
• Hyper-Growth of SMEs: Toward a Reconciliation of Entrepreneurial Orientation and Strategic Resources (2012, unknown): “(3) Managerial and entrepreneurial challenges associated with high-growth (Fombrun and Wally, 1989; Nicholls-Nixon, 2005; Fischer and Reuber, 2003).”
• Entrepreneurial aspirations, motivations, and their drivers (2008, background): “…policies are already shifting their focus from seeking to increase the quantity of entrepreneurs to improving the quality of entrepreneurship, which is reflected in the policy focus on high-growth entrepreneurship (Fischer and Reuber 2003; Smallbone et al. 2002; European Commission 2003).”
• Drivers of entrepreneurial aspirations at the country level: the role of start-up motivations and social security (2007, background): “…an entrepreneurship flavor that aim to stimulate innovation and growth (Stevenson and Landstrom 2001; Landstrom and Stevenson 2005; Audretsch et al. 2007) and high growth firms are prominent on the agenda of policy makers (Fischer and Reuber 2003; Smallbone et al. 2002; European Commission 2003).”
• The pecking order hypothesis: does it apply to start‐up firms? (2007, background): “However, the focus on a sample of high growth start-ups provides an insight into an area that has been subjected to too few studies ( Fischer and Reuber, 2003”