Managing technical-institutional design processes: some strategic lessons from environmental co-operatives in the Netherlands

By D. Roep, Jan Douwe van der Ploeg, J. Wiskerke. 2003

123 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Global and Planetary Change, Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law, Strategy and Management

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/42ffbe0fd0158758d8a64feb7ecc61d19d9a8b86

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Global and Planetary Change

1. C. Kilelu
2. C. Leeuwis
3. M. Verdegem
4. L. Klerkx

In Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law

1. C. Kilelu
2. C. Leeuwis
3. M. Schut
4. L. Klerkx

In Strategy and Management

1. C. Leeuwis
2. N. Aarts
3. C. Kilelu
4. L. Klerkx
5. M. Dickson
6. M. Schut
7. M. Verdegem
8. O. Joffre

Citations in the corpus

• How is innovation in aquaculture conceptualized and managed? A systematic literature review and reflection framework to inform analysis and action (2017, methodology): “This approach, which initially sought to understand industrial transformation, has moved to fields like energy and mobility and has also been applied in agriculture (Elzen et al., 2012; Ingram, 2015; Roep et al., 2003) and forestry (Åkerman et al., 2010).”
• INNOVATION PLATFORMS: EXPERIENCES WITH THEIR INSTITUTIONAL EMBEDDING IN AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH FOR DEVELOPMENT (2015, background): “Such system innovation requires fundamental restructuring of production systems, supply-chains, policies, management, monitoring and evaluation (M&E) and decision-making processes (Hall, 2005; Roep et al., 2003; van Mierlo and Totin, 2014).”
• Unravelling the role of innovation platforms in supporting co-evolution of innovation: Contributions and tensions in a smallholder dairy development programme (2013, background): “…not only in the sense of trying to fit into pre-existing conditions (Leeuwis and Aarts, 2011; Smits and Kuhlmann, 2004 ), but also in actively trying to change the socio-ins titutional environm ent, which has been referred to as effective reformism (Klerkx et al., 2010; Roep et al., 2003).”
• Adaptive management in agricultural innovation systems: The interactions between innovation networks and their environment (2010, background): “Elsewhere, this environment is indicated as the incumbent ‘socio-technical regime’ (Geels and Schot, 2007), and efforts to change it in favor of the realization and durable embedding of an innovation have been called ‘effective reformism’ (Roep et al., 2003).”