How warm is the corporate responses to climate change? Evidence from Pakistan and the UK

324 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Exploring the determinants and long-term performance outcomes of corporate carbon strategies (2017, background): “This is in line with previous research on the relevance of stakeholder and regulatory pressure for corporate climate action (e.g. Eberlein and Matten, 2009; Jeswani et al., 2008; Sprengel and Busch, 2011) and supports the reasoning of institutional and stakeholder theory.”
Business strategies and management accounting in response to climate change risk exposure and regulatory uncertainty (2017, background): “CMA - Carbon management accounting CC - Climate change”
An Investigation of Voluntary Corporate Greenhouse Gas Emissions Reporting in a Market Governance System: Australian Evidence (2011, background): “Additionally, stakeholders, including shareholders and consumers, are pressuring companies to reduce their GHG emissions ( Jeswani et al. , 2008”
Modeling the Impacts of Corporate Commitment on Climate Change (2012, background): “For example, in their study of the response of British and Pakistani businesses to climate change, Jeswani et al. (2008) identified four major clusters, based on operational and management activities: indifferent, beginner, emerging, and active.”