Development and Crisis of the Welfare State: Parties and Policies in Global Markets

By Robin S Stryker, E. Huber, John Stephens. 2001

1,963 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Finance, Political Science and International Relations

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/4211f4c19db64fa130bc04c357ebd46863b78219

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Finance

In Political Science and International Relations

Citations in the corpus

Precarious employment: understanding an emerging social determinant of health. (2014, background): “The underlying argument is that when union power and prolabor parties are strong, welfare states tend to be more universal and generous, which in turn improves health and narrows health inequalities (57, 58, 83, 85, 99, 121, 145).”
Two Decades of Change in Europe: The Emergence of the Social Investment State (2012, background): “Moreover, they seem to have adopted, albeit with considerable variation, a new policy orthodoxy, summarised as the ‘social investment strategy’.”
The Comparative Advantages of fsQCA and Regression Analysis for Moderately Large-N Analyses (2012, background): “…outcome, the change in active spending per unemployed, the qualitative breakpoints 0 and 1 are placed at 215 and + 15, a decision based on substantive knowledge of the cases that derives from, among others, Huber and Stephens (2001), Clasen (2005), and the OECD Employment Outlooks (various years).”
The political sustainability of climate policy: The case of the UK Climate Change Act § (2013, background): “(Huber and Stephens, 2001: 29, emphasis in the original) In this case, feedback worked through creating new constituencies, but it may also work through increasing or decreasing the political cohesion of previously favoured sectors, or altering the ‘‘cognitive mindset’’ of existing groups,…”
High-skilled outsiders? Labor market vulnerability, education and welfare state preferences (2015, background): “Just as large welfare states do not need to be redistributive welfare states at the macro-level (EspingAndersen, 1990; Huber and Stephens, 2001), welfare state preferences on the individual-level are not to be equated with preferences for ‘more’ or ‘less’ welfare state (Moene and Wallerstein, 2003;…”
Labour market- versus life course-related social policies: understanding cross-programme differences (2012, background): “Constitutional veto points are measured the same way as in Huber and Stephens (2001) as an additive index with federalism (none, weak, strong), presidentialism (absent, present), bicameralism (absent, weak, strong), and the use of popular referenda as a normal feature of the political process…”
Putting Poverty in Political Context: A Multi-Level Analysis of Adult Poverty across 18 Affluent Democracies (2009, background): “69 7 24 .6 10 67 .6 99 22 .9 30 Fr an ce 20 00 16 00 1 5.”
Decommodification and activation in social democratic policy: resolving the paradox (2008, methodology): “However, the subsequent recovery of employment in these two countries and the employment ‘miracle’ in Denmark (Huber and Stephens, 2001; Schwartz, 2001) cast doubt on this interpretation.”