Putting Poverty in Political Context: A Multi-Level Analysis of Adult Poverty across 18 Affluent Democracies

By David J. Brady, Andrew S. Fullerton, J. Cross. 2009

113 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Finance, Political Science and International Relations, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/84a7477c646bb130c6cc18fc951f58cad288aca8

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Finance

1. Amie Bostic
2. David J. Brady
3. V. Mahler
4. Andrew S. Fullerton
5. J. Cross

In Political Science and International Relations

1. Amie Bostic
2. David J. Brady
3. Ryan Finnigan
4. Linda M. Burton

In Sociology and Political Science

1. Amie Bostic
2. David J. Brady
3. Ryan Finnigan
4. Linda M. Burton
5. V. Mahler
6. Andrew S. Fullerton
7. J. Cross

Citations in the corpus

• The Oxford handbook of the social science of poverty (2016, background): “Such groups gain electoral power by forming unions and Left parties, and when in office, these parties expand the welfare state (Brady 2009; Brady, Fullerton, and Cross 2009; Hicks 1999; Huber and Stephens 2001; Korpi 1983; Moller et al.”
• Paradoxes of Social Policy (2015, methodology): “Primarily, it contributes to the growing literature on the political/institutional sources of poverty and inequality (Brady 2009; Brady et al. 2013; Brady et al. 2009; Kelly 2005; Kristal 2010; Moller et al. 2003; Moller 2008; Scruggs 2008).”
• When Unionization Disappears (2013, background): “Although power resources theory is traditionally used to explain welfare states, it offers a more general model of income distribution (Brady et al. 2009; Korpi 1983).”