A Constructive/ist Response to Glaser

By Antony Bryant. 2003

112 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/41cc420d8b320c3be0104639a19287e82f082464

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

1. M. Weed
2. D. Fletcher
3. Adam Gledhill
4. Anna Stodter

Citations in the corpus

• Research quality considerations for grounded theory research in sport & exercise psychology (2009, background): “…& Waring, in press; Cutcliffe, 2005; Goulding, 2002; Kennedy & Lingard, 2006; Selden, 2005; Wilson & Hutchinson, 1996) and the research methodology (Bryant, 2003; Bryant & Charmaz, 2007; Charmaz, 2000, 2006; Dey, 1999; Glaser, 1992; Glaser & Strauss, 1967; Greckhamer & Koro-Ljungberg, 2005; Kelle,…”
• A Novice Researcher’s First Walk Through the Maze of Grounded Theory: Rationalization for Classical Grounded Theory (2013, unknown): “Bryant (2003), a supporter of and co-author with Charmaz (Bryant & Charmaz 2007), sees constructivism methodology as seeking to deal with the conflict of potential bias of the researcher and not a direct attack on the philosophy of grounded theory.”