Citation indexes for science; a new dimension in documentation through association of ideas.

By Eugene Garfield. Science, 2006

2,123 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Global and Planetary Change, Statistics and Probability

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/41692ed07f393c1c3e335db99c7e3c5a0d265a78

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Global and Planetary Change

In Statistics and Probability

Citations in the corpus

From the science of science to Scientometrics visualizing the history of science with HistCite software (2009, background): “Price’s “Science Since Babylon” (Price 1986) was published six years after my 1955 paper in Science (Garfield, 1955).”
Journal list fetishism and the perversion of scholarship: reactivity and the ABS list (2011, methodology): “As Nkomo goes on to comment, ‘Knowledge appearing in journals that are not part of the [ISI Web] is rendered largely invisible’ (Garfield, 1955).”
Which Type of Citation Analysis Generates the Most Accurate Taxonomy of Scientific and Technical Knowledge? (2015, methodology): “The most appropriate place to start is with Garfield’s (1955) influential article titled “Citation Indexes for Science.” He was particularly concerned that, when analyzing the scientific literature, subject indexes could not pick up an emerging area of science as it was emerging. Citation analysis w”
Studying the History of Ideas Using Topic Models (2008, methodology): “One important method is to make use of citation graphs (Garﬁeld, 1955).”
Current state and future trends: a citation network analysis of the learning analytics field (2014, background): “In the 1950’s Garfield’s [8] ground-breaking work laid the foundation for contemporary work in citation analysis.”
Artificial intelligence in marketing: Topic modeling, scientometric analysis, and research agenda (2020, background): “Indeed, where and how scholars publish represent essential aspects of the identity of the marketing discipline, reflecting its value systems, aspirations, paradigms, reward systems, cultural conduct, and political hierarchy (Garfield, 2006; Lowry et al., 2004, 2013).”
Science Mapping: A Systematic Review of the Literature (2017, background): “Metrics and indicators of research impact include citation counts (Garfield, 1955), the h-index (Hirsch, 2005) and its numerous extensions, and a rich set of altmetrics on social media (Thelwall et al., 2013).”
PageRank beyond the Web (2014, methodology): “The field of bibliometrics is another big producer and consumer of network ranking methods, starting with seminal work by Garfield on aggregating data into a citation network between journals (Garfield, 1955; Garfield and Sher, 1963) and proceeding through Pinski and Narin (1976), who defined a clos”
Does Patent Strategy Shape the Long-Run Supply of Public Knowledge? Evidence from Human Genetics (2009, background): “As each piece of knowledge disclosed through a publication contributes to a public knowledge stream – the flow of public knowledge –it provides the foundation for the future knowledge with the inter-temporal contributions to the public knowledge streams linked through citations (Garfield, 1955).”
International nanotechnology development in 2003: Country, institution, and technology field analysis based on USPTO patent database (2004, positive): “Extending the patent analysis literature (Garfield, 1955; Karki, 1997; Oppenheim, 2000), we previously proposed an integrated framework for automatically assessing and mapping the development of the NSE field through analyzing patent documents .”
Self-Selected or Mandated, Open Access Increases Citation Impact for Higher Quality Research (2010, background): “h itself. A work’s research impact is an indication of how much it contributes to further research by other scientists and scholars, how much it is used, applied and built upon (Brin & Page 1998; Garfield 1955, 1976, 1988; Page et al. 1999). That is also why impact is valued, measured and reward”
Web of Science use in published research and review papers 1997–2017: a selective, dynamic, cross-domain, content-based analysis (2017, background): “…to trace the connections between citing and cited legal documents in the 1870s (Adair 1955), Garﬁeld proposed the idea of a uniﬁed index to scientiﬁc documents in his seminal paper titled ‘‘Citation Indexes for Science A New Dimension in Documentation through Association of Ideas’’ (Garﬁeld 1955).”
Evaluación de la calidad de los artículos y de las revistas científicas: Propuesta del factor de impacto ponderado y de un índice de calidad (2003, background): “Sin embargo, el criterio de medir el «impacto» de las publicaciones científicas fue planteado por Garfield (1955) y publicado en la revista Science, no obstante, el cri- Cuadro 1 Los diez mandamientos para incrementar las citas 01.”
Three options for citation tracking: Google Scholar, Scopus and Web of Science (2006, neutral): “Much has been written about citation analysis techniques [18-29], application to different disciplines [1,28,30], and controversies surrounding the use of citation analysis and journal impact factors to gauge the value and impact of a given journal title or the corpus of a given author [1-3].”