“EMOTIONAL INTELLIGENCE” IN THE CLASSROOM? AN ARISTOTELIAN CRITIQUE

By K. Kristjánsson. 2006

120 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Education, Social Psychology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/41445940ac301e2c725a28f92d1d7016a99679e7

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Education

1. L. Waterhouse
2. D. Hoffman

In Social Psychology

1. D. Hoffman
2. L. Waterhouse
3. Richard J. Haier
4. R. Berk
5. H. Gardner
6. Seana Moran

Citations in the corpus

• Inadequate Evidence for Multiple Intelligences, Mozart Effect, and Emotional Intelligence Theories (2006, background): “Kristjannson, K. (2006). “Emotional intelligence” in the classroom? An Ar-”
• Reflecting on Social Emotional Learning: A Critical Perspective on Trends in the United States (2009, background): “Boler (1999) and Kristjansson (2006), in their historical and philosophical critiques of emotional learning practices in schools, also point out the dangers of an emphasis on emotion in the classroom as a potential source of ideological manipulation.”