A new protein-protein docking scoring function based on interface residue properties

67 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

DockQ: A Quality Measure for Protein-Protein Docking Models (2016, methodology): “Thus, the scoring part of CAPRI [8] and benchmarks of scoring functions for docking [11,10,12,13] only focuses on the ability to select good models according to the CAPRI classification, completely ignoring the potential useful information in the lower ranked models in assessing the ability to…”
Protein–protein docking dealing with the unknown (2009, methodology): “…analysis of known interfaces or Machine Learning techniques,117 or more sophisticated force fields used in subsequent refinement steps.118 Bernauer et al., 2007 developed a scoring function based on a Voronoi tessellation of the protein three-dimensional structures, which provides a…”
The scoring of poses in protein-protein docking: current capabilities and future directions (2013, methodology): “In these cases, flexible machine learning algorithms capable of inferring these relationships can be used to tailor scoring functions to the structures produced by the sampling methods [124], and indeed examples of this approach can be found in the literature [91-97].”