Interpreting SF&-36 summary health measures: A response

By J. Ware, M. Kosinski. Quality of Life Research, 2004

626 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Management Science and Operations Research, Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/40db4544b6d026cea2073640ee81230ff5683eda

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Management Science and Operations Research

1. Russell E. Glasgow
2. Z. Younossi
3. L. Green
4. Taryn Moir

In Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health

1. Z. Younossi

In Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health

1. Russell E. Glasgow
2. Z. Younossi

Citations in the corpus

• Evaluating the Relevance, Generalization, and Applicability of Research (2006, background): “Quality of life (Kaplan, 2003) is a measure of ultimate impact and can provide a common metric for comparing different programs for different target problems by comparing their impact on health-related quality of life ( Ware & Kosinski, 2001 ).”
• Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease - A global public health perspective. (2019, methodology): “Some of the tools more commonly used to measure PROs in patients with NAFLD include the generic health-related quality of life (HRQoL) tool, the SF-36, and the disease specific tool the Chronic Liver Disease Questionnaire (CLDQ).(103,104) However, due to the exponential increase in NAFLD and NASH ca”