The Philosophy of Economics: The Limitations of Marginal Utility

By T. Veblen. 2007

379 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Political Science and International Relations, Public Administration

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/40c8259e41343bd0d471b56845dcac4f1c54b9bd

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Political Science and International Relations

1. Craig Crossland
2. Donald C. Hambrick
3. Tony Lawson

In Public Administration

1. Craig Crossland
2. Donald C. Hambrick
3. Tony Lawson

Citations in the corpus

• Differences in managerial discretion across countries: how nation‐level institutions affect the degree to which ceos matter (2011, background): “…the twentieth century in the fields of political science (Willoughby, 1896; Wilson, 1889), sociology (Durkheim, 1893; Weber, 1924), and economics (Veblen, 1909), institutional research may be viewed in part as a reaction to prevailing neoclassical theories favoring the universal over the…”
• What is this ‘school’ called neoclassical economics? (2013, background): “…school and the generality of classical economists lies mainly in the fact that in the marginal utility economics the common postulates are more consistently adhered to at the same time that they are more neatly defined and their limitations are more adequately realized’ (Veblen, 1909, pp. 620–22).”