Contrasting evolutionary flexibility in sister groups: disparity and diversity in Mesozoic atelostomate echinoids

By G. Eble. Paleobiology, 2000

114 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/401984898245ea60d01802fc869a88d5f027d8c3

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Oceanography

In Paleontology

Citations in the corpus

Evolution of hypercarnivory: the effect of specialization on morphological and taxonomic diversity (2004, background): “…that possession of certain morphological character states may reduce the ability to attain certain other states (Lauder 1981; Smith et al. 1985; Emerson 1988; Futuyma and Moreno 1988; Werdelin 1996; Donoghue and Ree 2000; Wagner and Schwenk 2000), implying that the subsequent evolutionary…”
The continuity of microevolution and macroevolution (2002, background): “Survival of echinoids through the end-Cretaceous event, although selective (Smith & Jeffery, 1998; Eble, 2000), is independent of infaunal or epifaunal habit (Smith & Jeffery, 1998); rather, variation in feeding strategy among both deposit-feeding (penicillate tube feet, suctorial tube feet, or no t”
Micro- and macroevolution: scale and hierarchy in evolutionary biology and paleobiology (2000, background): “…in the morphological divergence of the founding species for two echinoid orders relative to the disparity among species in the ancestral group, showing how the onshore initiators of these orders "broke away from the bounds of [their ancestor's] morphospace from the very start" (Eble 2000: p. 68).”
DISPARITY: MORPHOLOGICAL PATTERN AND DEVELOPMENTAL CONTEXT (2007, background): “…suites, the trend has been towards inclusion of a greater range of characters, both because estimates of morphological disparity may vary between characters, and because this allows partitioning of characters with different functional roles (Foote 1994; Wagner 1995; Eble 2000b; Ciampaglio 2004).”
The ontogenetic dynamics of shape disparity (2003, methodology): “…environmental factors, such as decreasing ecological space (Jablonski and Bottjer 1990; Erwin et al. 1987; Valentine 1995; Valentine and Campbell 1995), and one that focuses on intrinsic factors, such as the origin of developmental constraints (e.g., Jacobs 1990; Gould 1991; Erwin 1994; Eble 2000).”
SCALE AND HIERARCHY IN MACROEVOLUTION (2007, background): “…appear to be robust to sampling biases, taxonomic revisions and new discoveries, and, in the few instances tested, to the use of apomorphies or morphospace occupation rather than taxonomic proxies for the origins of novelties (Jablonski and Bottjer 1990; Eble 2000; Jablonski 2005b) (Text-fig.”