The ontogenetic dynamics of shape disparity

By M. Zelditch, H. Sheets, W. Fink. Paleobiology, 2003

149 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Geometry and Topology, Global and Planetary Change, Paleontology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/545472c261a15819f744e56472b039a57d10dd8e

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Geometry and Topology

1. P. Gunz
2. P. Mitteroecker
3. Sonja Windhager
4. Katrin Schaefer
5. E. Rayfield
6. K. Angielczyk
7. S. Pierce
8. C. Klingenberg

In Global and Planetary Change

1. E. Rayfield
2. K. Angielczyk
3. S. Pierce

In Paleontology

1. P. Mitteroecker
2. P. Gunz
3. Sonja Windhager
4. Katrin Schaefer
5. K. Angielczyk
6. S. Pierce
7. E. Rayfield
8. C. Klingenberg

Citations in the corpus

• A brief review of shape, form, and allometry in geometric morphometrics, with applications to human facial morphology (2013, background): “…allometries arose, advocating different morphometric and statistical approaches (e.g., O’Higgins et al. 2001; Ponce de Leon and Zollikofer 2001; Zelditch et al. 2003; Mitteroecker et al. 2004a,b, 2005; Gerber et al. 2007; Gerber 2011; Adams and Collyer 2009; Piras et al. 2011; Gunz 2012;…”
• Morphospace occupation in thalattosuchian crocodylomorphs: skull shape variation, species delineation and temporal patterns (2009, methodology): “Disparity was measured by summing the squared Procrustes distance between the mean shape of each subgroup and the grand mean shape of all subgroups in the data set (Zelditch et al. 2003, 2004).”