Regulatory Uncertainty: A Reason to Postpone Investments? Not Necessarily
By V. H. Hoffmann, T. Trautmann, Jens Hamprecht. 2009
173 citations recorded by the source corpus.
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/3ffd4e1e1265ed3abe43e9ca01c12cf0bb6b0bbe
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
- F. Egli
- Bjarne Steffen
- F. Polzin
- Tobias S. Schmidt
- Jean-François Henri
- D. Talbot
- Olivier Boiral
- Martin J. A. Schuetz
Citations in the corpus
- How do policies mobilize private finance for renewable energy?—A systematic review with an investor perspective (2019, background): “In some cases, mainly as a response to the newly induced risk (carbon price volatility), ETSs might lead to the postponing of RE investments [115].”
- The effects of climate policy on the rate and direction of innovation: a survey of the EU ETS and the electricity sector (2012, background): “In order to provide good orientation and increase the predictability of climate policy, an important aspect for corporate investment decisions (Engau and Hoffmann, 2011; Hoffmann et al., 2009), LTT should be solid and clearly communicated.”
- Modeling the Impacts of Corporate Commitment on Climate Change (2012, background): “Most recent studies have highlighted that this prevailing uncertainty and the lack of substantial commitment from some governments encourages a ‘wait and see’ approach (Jones and Levy, 2007; Luo, 2004; Boiral, 2006; The Economist Intelligence Unit, 2008), although some authors dispute this link (Hof”