Rethinking Community Assembly through the Lens of Coexistence Theory

1,369 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Community assembly, coexistence and the environmental filtering metaphor (2015, background): “Finally, it is now clear from both theory (e.g. Chesson 2000; Mayfield & Levine 2010; HilleRisLambers et al. 2012) and experiments (e.”
A general framework for quantitatively assessing ecological stochasticity (2019, background): “However, competition could also cause communities to be more similar if competitive exclusion could eliminate more different and less related species which lack certain competitive traits (30, 31).”
Chesson's coexistence theory (2018, background): “The above is a quote from HilleRisLambers et al. (2012), but see also Chesson (2000b), Adler et al. (2007), Levine and HilleRisLambers (2009), Adler et al. (2010), Mayfield and Levine (2010), Chesson (2011), Narwani et al. (2013), and Kraft et al. (2015).”
Spatial scale and intraspecific trait variability mediate assembly rules in alpine grasslands (2017, background): “First, different assembly rules can lead to similar observed diversity patterns (Mayfield & Levine 2010; HilleRisLambers et al. 2012).”