The Power of a Picture: Overcoming Scientific Misinformation by Communicating Weight‐of‐Evidence Information with Visual Exemplars

By Graham N. Dixon, B. McKeever, Avery E. Holton, Christopher E. Clarke, G. Eosco. 2015

97 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Literature and Literary Theory, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/3ef3f5e338d7b31535e0182d2f285b7f008c9f28

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Literature and Literary Theory

1. S. van der Linden
2. Melisa Basol
3. John Cook
4. J. Compton
5. Eric Merkley
6. Dominik A. Stecuła
7. J. Roozenbeek

In Sociology and Political Science

1. S. van der Linden
2. Melisa Basol
3. J. Compton
4. John Cook
5. Eric Merkley
6. Dominik A. Stecuła
7. J. Roozenbeek
8. J. Reser

Citations in the corpus

• Inoculation theory in the post‐truth era: Extant findings and new frontiers for contested science, misinformation, and conspiracy theories (2021, background): “Unfortunately, despite the efforts of many parties to communicate science effectively, using a vast array of communication channels and tools (Flemming et al., 2018), public misperceptions of science and scientific research continue (Dixon et al., 2015).”
• Framing Climate Change: Economics, Ideology, and Uncertainty in American News Media Content From 1988 to 2014 (2019, result): “Scholars have speculated that uncertainty frames confuse the public about the state of the science, and reduce their propensity to engage in mitigation behavior (Boykoff and Boykoff, 2007), and there is some experimental evidence in support of that notion (Dixon and Clarke, 2013; Clarke et al., 2015”