Movement synchrony and perceived entitativity

By Daniël Lakens. 2010

212 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Cognitive Neuroscience, Social Psychology, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/3ec076bcf1d53293149c5ee09acf2dbb03ca6ba4

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Cognitive Neuroscience

In Social Psychology

In Sociology and Political Science

Citations in the corpus

Moving in and out of synchrony: A concept for a new intervention fostering empathy through interactional movement and dance (2012, background): “…are t a higher risk of being socially excluded. ynchronous movement Interactional synchrony is mainly defined as interpersonal coorination of behaviors in the dimension of time, with similar or even ifferent, but simultaneous movements or change of postures (e.g., ove & Risen, 2009; Lakens, 2010).”
Does synchrony promote generalized prosociality? (2014, background): “perceive synchronous dyads as high in entitativity (Lakens, 2010), with such a cue for”
If They Move in Sync, They Must Feel in Sync: Movement Synchrony Leads to Attributions of Rapport and Entitativity (2011, methodology): “This method was based on earlier work by Lakens (2010) who showed that movement synchrony influenced entitativity judgments.”
Designing educational technologies in the age of AI: A learning sciences-driven approach (2019, result): “The results aligned with existing research findings in the Learning Sciences field (Damon & Phelps, 1989; Lakens & Stel, 2011; Lakens, 2010; Schneider & Pea, 2013 and Dillenbourg et al., 2011).”
The antecedents and consequences of human behavioral mimicry. (2013, background): “…(Neda et al. 2000), pendulum swinging (Richardson et al. 2005, Schmidt & O’Brien 1997), rocking chair movement (Richardson et al. 2007), waving (Lakens 2010), finger tapping (Oullier et al. 2008), music making (e.g., piano playing; Keller et al. 2007), and dancing (Kirschner & Tomasello 2010).”
It’s better together: The psychological benefits of singing in a choir (2016, background): “, 2013), and physical synchrony has been found to foster a greater sense of entitativity among otherwise unrelated participants (Lakens, 2010; Lakens & Stel, 2011).”
From Mind Perception to Mental Connection: Synchrony as a Mechanism for Social Understanding (2012, background): “Those who coordinate their actions have greater ties to community (McNeill, 1995), are perceived as and form social units (Lakens, 2010; Marsh, Johnston, Richardson, & Schmidt, 2009; Wiltermuth & Heath, 2009), and report greater ‘‘liking’’ (Bernieri, 1988; Ramseyer & Tschacher, 2011).”
Interpersonal Synchrony: A Survey of Evaluation Methods across Disciplines (2012, background): “When addressing the matter of movement synchrony and its relation to perceived entitativity, Lakens observed that objective differences in movement rhythms were linearly related to ratings of perceived entitativity [50].”