Prosocial and Antisocial Behavior in Sport Scale

By M. Kavussanu, I. Boardley. 2014

121 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Developmental and Educational Psychology, Gender Studies, Social Psychology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/3e4e1872171009f636597d09c0e59556e097c474

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Developmental and Educational Psychology

1. S. Cheon
2. J. Reeve
3. Nikos Ntoumanis
4. J. Côté
5. K. Erickson
6. Wade D. Gilbert
7. Matthew Vierimaa
8. P. Trudel

In Gender Studies

1. J. Côté
2. Matthew Vierimaa
3. J. Reeve
4. K. Erickson
5. Nikos Ntoumanis
6. Wade D. Gilbert
7. S. Cheon

In Social Psychology

1. S. Cheon
2. J. Reeve
3. Nikos Ntoumanis
4. J. Côté
5. K. Erickson
6. Maarten Vansteenkiste
7. M. Standage
8. Wade D. Gilbert

Citations in the corpus

• Positive Youth Development: A Measurement Framework for Sport (2012, methodology): “Initial testing determined that the instrument is valid and reliable for use with adolescent team sport athletes with α coefficients ranging from .74 to .86 [45].”
• A needs‐supportive intervention to help PE teachers enhance students' prosocial behavior and diminish antisocial behavior (2018, methodology): “…prosocial teammate scale (e.g., “encouraged a classmate”; α = .79), and to assess antisocial behavior teachers used the 4-item antisocial teammate scale (e.g., “verbally abused a classmate”; α = .81) from the Prosocial and Antisocial Behavior in Sport Scale (PABSS; Kavussanu & Boardley, 2009).”