What Science Communication Scholars Think About Training Scientists to Communicate
By J. Besley, Andrea Tanner. 2011
194 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Communication, Sociology and Political Science
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/3de3b533ed84f7e9b69c6e8a9af4c695502d1f97
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Communication
In Sociology and Political Science
- Anthony Dudo
- A. Baram‐Tsabari
- B. Swire‐Thompson
- Niveen Abi Ghannam
- Bruce V. Lewenstein
- David M. J. Lazer
- Michael A. Cacciatore
- J. Besley
Citations in the corpus
- The lure of rationality: Why does the deficit model persist in science communication? (2016, background): “For instance, Besley and Tanner (2011) and Petersen et al. (2009) found that many scientists prefer one-way communication with the public that is rooted in the deficit model approach.”
- Qualitative Interviews With Science Communication Trainers About Communication Objectives and Goals (2016, background): “Other work has looked at questions such as what science communication researchers feel like scientists need from training (Besley & Tanner, 2011) or attempted to develop tools to support training efforts (Baram-Tsabari & Lewenstein, 2013).”
- Public Health and Online Misinformation: Challenges and Recommendations. (2019, background): “Avenues where fast, affordable health advice is readily available from experts can only be beneficial for reducing misinformation on”
- Science communication training: what are we trying to teach? (2017, background): “Several papers were particularly important, because they themselves were summaries of some science communication training literature (Besley & Tanner, 2011; Bray, France, & Gilbert, 2011; Longnecker & Gondwe, 2014; 288 A. BARAM-TSABARI AND B.V. LEWENSTEIN Miller et al., 2009; Mulder et al., 2008;…”