Sex Offender Community Notification: Its Role in Recidivism and Offender Reintegration
By R. Zevitz. 2006
147 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Clinical Psychology, Sociology and Political Science
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/3cc447f873e31ea1dbe77f2ecb1ae4c90e1a455a
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Clinical Psychology
- J. Levenson
- R. Tewksbury
- Wesley G. Jennings
- Lisa L. Sample
- Amy L. Anderson
- Susan L. Miller
- Michelle L. Meloy
- K. Curtis
In Sociology and Political Science
- J. Levenson
- R. Tewksbury
- Wesley G. Jennings
- Lisa L. Sample
- Amy L. Anderson
- Susan L. Miller
- Michelle L. Meloy
- K. Curtis
Citations in the corpus
- Sex Offender Residence Restrictions: Unintended Consequences and Community Reentry (2007, background): “…that sex offender registration and community notification can interfere with community reentry and adjustment (Levenson & Cotter, 2005a; Levenson, D’Amora, & Hern, 2007; Sample & Streveler, 2003; Tewksbury, 2004; Tewksbury, 2005; Tewksbury & Lees, 2006; Zevitz, 2006a; Zevitz, Crim, & Farkas, 2000).”
- Collateral Damage: Family Members of Registered Sex Offenders (2009, background): “…decreased as a result of SORN laws (Duwe and Donnay 2008; Washington State Institute for Public Policy 2005), but the majority of research does not indicate significant changes in sex crime trends following the implementation of these policies (Adkins et al. 2000; Vasquez et al. 2008; Zevitz 2006).”
- Making Sense out of Nonsense: The Deconstruction of State-Level Sex Offender Residence Restrictions (2008, background): “Reviewing the literature on residence restrictions and other sex offender policies (Colorado Department of Public Safety 2004; Durling 2006; Iowa County Attorneys Association 2006; Levenson 2006; Levenson and Cotter 2005; Levenson and D’Amora 2007; Levenson and Hern 2007; Minnesota Department of Cor”
- DOES A WATCHED POT BOIL? A Time-Series Analysis of New York State's Sex Offender Registration and Notification Law (2008, background): “Thus, taken as a whole, the results of the various studies cited above support the view of Zevitz (2006) that, “the anticipated preventive benefits of the community notification policy initiative would appear to be limited” (p. 205).”
- Assessing the Impact of Sex Offender Registration and Community Notification On Sex-Offending Trajectories (2010, background): “These results are in line with those reported by previous studies (Adkins et al., 2000; Duwe & Donnay, 2008; Freeman, 2009; Letourneau & Armstrong, 2008; Sandler et al., 2008; Schram & Milloy, 1995; Vasquez et al.; Zevitz, 2006; Zgoba et al., 2008).”
- Social Policies Designed to Prevent Sexual Violence (2007, background): “%) than did 166 high-risk sex offenders who were not subject to notification (12%; Zevitz, 2006).”
- Public Perceptions About Sex Offenders and Community Protection Policies (2007, background): “In Wisconsin, it was found that none of the recidivistic offenses in the study sample were for predatory sex crimes involving strangers (Zevitz, 2006b).”
- Effects of South Carolina’s Sex Offender Registration and Notification Policy on Adult Recidivism (2010, result): “…include six group comparison studies (Adkins, Huff, & Stageberg, 2000; Duwe & Donnay, 2008; Letourneau & Armstrong, 2008; Schram & Milloy, 1995; Zevitz, 2006; Zgoba, Witt, Dalessandro, & Veysey, 2009), four trend analysis studies (Sandler, Freeman, & Socia, 2008; Vasquez, Maddan, & Walker,…”
- Public Awareness and Action Resulting From Sex Offender Community Notification Laws (2008, background): “…on the notion that citizens should be informed of sex offenders’ information and whereabouts, so they may take some preventative action to protect themselves and their children (Caputo & Brodsky, 2003; M. Cohen & Jeglic, 2007; Levenson, 2007; Pawson, 2007; Tewksbury, 2002, 2005; Zevitz, 2006).”
- AN EXAMINATION OF THE SEX OFFENDER REGISTRATION AND NOTIFICATION ACT AS APPLIED TO JUVENILES Evaluating the Ability to Predict Sexual Recidivism (2008, background): “Extant research has not supported the effectiveness of sex offender registration and notification at reducing recidivism with adults (Adkins, Huff, & Stageberg, 2000; Barnoski, 2005; Levenson, D’Amora, & Hern, 2007; Schram & Milloy, 1995; Walker, Maddan, Vasquez, VanHouten, & Ervin-McLarty, 2005; We”