Governing through Quality: Conventions and Supply Relations in the Value Chain for South African Wine

By S. Ponte. 2009

165 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Plant Science, Strategy and Management, Tourism, Leisure and Hospitality Management

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/3c314ba2b5876085658c81ca160a6dcd0abbb277

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Plant Science

1. Jennifer Bair
2. J. Ewert
3. S. Ponte
4. Arthur P. J. Mol
5. S. Bush
6. T. Sturgeon
7. P. Oosterveer
8. Megan Bailey

In Strategy and Management

1. Jennifer Bair
2. S. Ponte
3. P. Gibbon
4. Gary Gereffi
5. P. Oosterveer
6. T. Sturgeon
7. Arthur P. J. Mol
8. S. Bush

In Tourism, Leisure and Hospitality Management

1. J. Ewert
2. P. Gibbon
3. Jennifer Bair
4. T. Sturgeon
5. Arthur P. J. Mol
6. Megan Bailey
7. S. Bush
8. P. Oosterveer

Citations in the corpus

• Governing global value chains: an introduction (2008, methodology): “While the use of convention theory to unpack GVC governance is continued by one of the authors elsewhere (Ponte 2008), in this collection the effort to understand governance in terms of normalization is carried out by Gibbon and Ponte, who discuss normalization in terms of governmentality.”
• Which Way is "Up" in Upgrading? Trajectories of Change in the Value Chain for South African Wine (2009, methodology): “The focus in this article is on upgrading trajectories, while an analysis of governance in the South African segment of the wine GVC is available elsewhere (Ponte, 2007b; 2009).”
• Intellectual monopoly in global value chains (2019, unknown): “…some mid-quality and high-quality segments of the wine industry, labels and Indication of Geographical Origin can offers some ressources for developing countries producers to control and increase symbolic value of their products (Ponte & Daviron, 2011; Ponte Stefano, 2009; Staricco & Ponte, 2015).”
• Sustainability governance of chains and networks: a review and future outlook (2015, background): “Governance through (commodity or value) chains instead captures what Ponte and Gibbon (2005) consider governance as normalisation; that is, how external nonfirm actors, such as consumers, NGOs and government institutions, structure flows of information that are taken up in the norms and practices of”
• Integrating Poverty and Environmental Concerns into Value-Chain Analysis: A Conceptual Framework (2010, unknown): “Development Policy Review 28 (2) Recent literature has highlighted that other forms of ‘upgrading’ are equally important, and may combine some of the above categories, or even go beyond them: delivering larger volumes (even of lower quality), matching standards and certifications, delivering on logi”
• Power in global value chains (2019, unknown): “…most clearly exercised by the public sector through local, national and regional regulation, multi-stakeholder initiatives also play an important role, such as fair trade, organic and biodynamic certification bodies, industry associations and wine exhibitions, fairs and competitions (Ponte 2009).”
• Explaining governance in global value chains: A modular theory-building effort (2014, background): “…it has reflected upon differences in business culture or normative expectations of how a ‘good business’ is organized (Gibbon and Ponte, 2005; Ponte, 2009; Bair and Werner, 2011), and it has been fine-tuning the territorial and contested dimensions of restructuring in global value chains…”