“Sight‐unseen” detection of rare aquatic species using environmental DNA

By C. Jerde, A. Mahon, W. L. Chadderton, David M. Lodge. 2011

1,111 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Ecology, Molecular Biology, Nature and Landscape Conservation

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/3c310621cf2ffd6437e53031f12f43fc82657319

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Ecology

In Molecular Biology

In Nature and Landscape Conservation

Citations in the corpus

Stock assessment in inland fisheries: a foundation for sustainable use and conservation (2016, background): “Presence-absence is particularly relevant in the context of detecting the distribution of endangered species (Jerde et al. 2011), assessing biodiversity (Lodge et al. 2012; Thomsen et al. 2012) or detecting invaders (Jerde et al. 2011).”
Persistence of Environmental DNA in Freshwater Ecosystems (2011, background): “introduced Asian carp in North America [10])but also to control the efficiency of eradication actions.”
Detection of Asian carp DNA as part of a Great Lakes basin-wide surveillance program (2013, methodology): “In addition to sampling in the CAWS (Jerde et al. 2011), we sampled parts of Lakes Michigan and Erie (Table 1; Fig.”
The ecology of environmental DNA and implications for conservation genetics (2016, methodology): “…targeted in aquatic (Thomsen et al. 2012a) and terrestrial environments (Andersen et al. 2012), high rates of success detecting taxa which produce slimy coatings such as amphibians (Ficetola et al. 2008) and fish (Jerde et al. 2011) suggest that other bodily fluids also act as a source of eDNA.”
Phenotypic plasticity in the spawning traits of bigheaded carp (Hypophthalmichthys spp.) in novel ecosystems (2013, methodology): “Bigheaded carp have become widely established in temperate and tropical fresh waters worldwide and now constitute an imminent threat to the Great Lakes basin and fresh waters elsewhere (Jerde et al., 2011; Rasmussen et al., 2011; Cudmore et al., 2012).”
Monitoring endangered freshwater biodiversity using environmental DNA. (2012, methodology): “Although of great potential for contemporary biodiversity monitoring, environmental DNA detection in wild populations has so far only been applied to a few common or invasive species of amphibians and fish (Ficetola et al. 2008; Goldberg et al. 2011; Jerde et al. 2011).”
Biodiversity soup: metabarcoding of arthropods for rapid biodiversity assessment and biomonitoring (2012, background): “Jerde et al. (2011), Goldberg et al. (2011) and Thomsen et al. (2011) have further validated the use of environmental DNA in water bodies, even in fast-moving streams, for detecting a variety of vertebrate and invertebrate species, including a mammal species.”
DNA-based methods in paleolimnology: new opportunities for investigating long-term dynamics of lacustrine biodiversity (2017, methodology): “Molecular techniques were employed successfully to detect other invasive organisms, including vertebrates, invertebrates, plants and pathogens (Jerde et al. 2011; Mahon et al. 2013; Goldberg et al. 2015), by analysis of water samples; consequently some public agencies are now implementing eDNA analy”
Trawl and eDNA assessment of marine fish diversity, seasonality, and relative abundance in coastal New Jersey, USA (2021, background): “Technical factors related to PCR can distort eDNA findings, including co-purification of inhibitors along with DNA, primer bias, unrecognized cross-contamination, and non-linear amplification kinetics (Jerde et al., 2011; Roussel et al., 2015; Taberlet et al., 2018; Kelly et al., 2019).”
Effective monitoring of freshwater fish (2019, background): “Environmental DNA (‘eDNA’ hereafter) is based on the presence DNA of fishes in water samples originating from mucus and faeces, the sloughing off of cells from their gut lining, and the decomposition of dead individuals (Davison et al., 2016; Jerde et al., 2011; Turner et al., 2015).”
Site occupancy models in the analysis of environmental DNA presence/absence surveys: a case study of an emerging amphibian pathogen (2013, background): “…are cryptic andhard todetect, soecologists and conservationbiologists have recently begun to survey the distributions of aquatic species using environmental DNA (eDNA; Brinkman et al. 2003; Walker et al. 2007; Ficetola et al. 2008; Jerde et al. 2011; Goldberg et al. 2011; Thomsen et al. 2012).”
Uses and Misuses of Environmental DNA in Biodiversity Science and Conservation (2018, background): “Two obvious benefits relate to the capacity of these methods to reveal the presence of organisms that cannot otherwise be sampled (rare or ephemeral species) or recognized (cryptic species, larval stages, degraded specimens) (Caesar et al. 2006, Jerde et al. 2011).”
Ocean's eleven: a critical evaluation of the role of population, evolutionary and molecular genetics in the management of wild fisheries (2015, background): “In a large river and canal complex in the northeastern USA, eDNA has been used to delimit the range of two species of invasive carp (Jerde et al. 2011).”
Environmental DNA surveillance for invertebrate species: advantages and technical limitations to detect invasive crayfish Procambarus clarkii in freshwater ponds. (2014, background): “Unfortunately, the detection of target species at low densities is particularly difficult in aquatic ecosystems (Harvey, Qureshi & MacIsaac 2009; Jerde et al. 2011).”