Environmental DNA surveillance for invertebrate species: advantages and technical limitations to detect invasive crayfish Procambarus clarkii in freshwater ponds.

By A. Treguier, J. Paillisson, Tony Dejean, A. Valentini, M. Schlaepfer, J. Roussel. 2014

274 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/b45a395e89809b8fed48c176db522ae8a81b29b6

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Ecology

In Molecular Biology

Citations in the corpus

The need for robust qPCR‐based eDNA detection assays in environmental monitoring and species inventories (2020, methodology): “Analytical assay sensitivity could be preliminarily assessed using a dilution series of target total DNA (e.g., 10–6 to 10–3 ng/µl Hobbs et al., 2020; Tréguier et al., 2014).”
Unravelling the global invasion routes of a worldwide invader, the red swamp crayfish (Procambarus clarkii) (2019, background): “…presence of different 517 genetic clusters in Europe reported here, probably led to the failure of eDNA probes in detecting 518 French populations of P. clarkii (Tréguier et al., 2014; Mauvisseau et al., 2018), which had worked 519 well with the less variable Chinese populations (Cai et al., 2017).”
Environmental DNA metabarcoding: Transforming how we survey animal and plant communities (2017, methodology): “…ponds (Ficetola et al., 2008), the method immediately came to the attention of researchers interested in invasion biology (e.g., Egan et al., 2013; Goldberg, Sepulveda, Ray, Baumgardt, & Waits, 2013; Jerde, Mahon, Chadderton, & Lodge, 2011; Takahara, Minamoto, & Doi, 2013; Tr eguier et al., 2014).”
Environmental DNA - An emerging tool in conservation for monitoring past and present biodiversity (2015, methodology): “River Crustacean, mussel Switzerland Present Pilliod et al. (2014) Factors influencing detection of eDNA from a streamdwelling amphibian Streams Amphibian (idaho giant salamander) Idaho, USA Present Tréguier et al. (2014) Environmental DNA surveillance for invertebrate species: advantages and techni”
Uses and Misuses of Environmental DNA in Biodiversity Science and Conservation (2018, background): “Early studies focused on detecting target species of amphibians (Ficetola et al. 2008, Goldberg et al. 2011, Dejean et al. 2012, Thomsen et al. 2012), fishes ( Jerde et al. 2011), mammals (Thomsen et al. 2012), and invertebrates (Gardham et al. 2014, Treguier et al. 2014).”
How will the ‘molecular revolution’ contribute to biological recording? (2015, background): “…apus) Temporary pools Monitoring biodiversity qPCR Thomsen et al., 2012b Red swamp crayfish (Procambarus clarkii) Ponds Detection of IAS qPCR Tréguier et al., 2014 Molluscs Ancylus fluviatilis Rivers and lakes Detecting indicator species Standard PCR Mächler et al., 2014 Zebra mussel…”
Environmental DNA (eDNA) detects the invasive crayfishes Orconectes rusticus and Pacifastacus leniusculus in large lakes of North America (2017, background): “…because these comparisons to date have primarily used surface water samples for eDNA in comparison to trapping data for a benthic organism (but see Tréguier et al., 2014), and this might have been especially relevant in a large lake like Tahoe where P. leniusculus is known to use exceptionally…”
The ecology of environmental DNA and implications for conservation genetics (2016, background): “Other eDNA surveillance targets in natural waters have included Bluegill Sunfish (Lepomis macrochirus) invading ponds in Japan (Takahara and Minamoto 2013), New Zealand mudsnails (Potamopyrgus antipodarum) in streams of Idaho, USA (Goldberg et al. 2013), Ponto- Caspian zebra mussels (Dreissena polym”
Using eDNA to develop a national citizen science-based monitoring programme for the great crested newt (Triturus cristatus) (2015, methodology): “The DNA extraction was performed following the method describe in Treguier et al. (2014).”