Detection of Asian carp DNA as part of a Great Lakes basin-wide surveillance program

By C. Jerde, W. L. Chadderton, A. Mahon, M. Renshaw, Joel B. Corush, M. Budny, S. Mysorekar, David M. Lodge. 2013

318 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Ecology, Molecular Biology, Nature and Landscape Conservation

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/9c6bd65f04cecd91d38cf4e78d151ac69fa5f23b

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Ecology

In Molecular Biology

In Nature and Landscape Conservation

Citations in the corpus

Comparing local‐ and regional‐scale estimations of the diversity of stream fish using eDNA metabarcoding and conventional observation methods (2018, background): “57 The ubiquitous presence of fish eDNA in the water column has led to its use as a tool to detect 58 invasive (Takahara et al., 2013; Jerde et al., 2013; Mahon et al., 2013) and rare or threatened 59 species (Wilcox et al., 2013; Sigsgaard, 2015), as well as to determine biomass (Takahara et 60…”
Methods for the extraction, storage, amplification and sequencing of DNA from environmental samples (2018, methodology): “Studies using Dneasy PowerWater® kits targeted DNA from fish (e.g. Jerde et al. 2013; Keskin 2014), but also amphibians (e.g. Olson et al. 2012) and an aquatic reptile (Burmese python; Hunter et al. 2015).”
Environmental DNA (eDNA) detects the invasive crayfishes Orconectes rusticus and Pacifastacus leniusculus in large lakes of North America (2017, background): “…moving from proof of concept to actual implementation for purposes like surveillance for the early arrival of new or spreading invasive species (e.g., Jerde et al., 2013; Egan et al., 2015) or documenting distributional or population trends for imperiled species (e.g., de Souza et al., 2016).”
Active and passive environmental DNA surveillance of aquatic invasive species (2016, background): “Additionally, active surveillance has been more thoroughly developed for use in aquatic systems in recent years (e.g., Lodge et al. 2012; Jerde et al. 2013; Nathan et al. 2015).”
Monitoring the near-extinct European weather loach in Denmark based on environmental DNA from water samples (2015, background): “However, Jerde et al. (2013) concluded that the presence of carp eDNA was most likely to indicate presence of live specimens, as eDNA was only detected where carps had been caught historically, or where later ﬁshing surveys detected the species.”
Quantifying relative fish abundance with eDNA: a promising tool for fisheries management (2016, methodology): “popularity of this method to assess presence/absence is growing fast and expectation of using species inventories collected via eDNA instead of traditional sampling methods is gaining broad interest (Jerde et al. 2011; Dejean et al. 2012; Thomsen et al. 2012a; Jerde et al. 2013; Mahon et al. 2013; P”
Early detection of aquatic invaders using metabarcoding reveals a high number of non‐indigenous species in Canadian ports (2016, background): “…target species such as Asian carp, the American bullfrog, the bluegill sunfish, the New Zealand mudsnail and the red swamp crayfish (Ficetola et al., 2008; Dejean et al., 2011, 2012; Jerde et al., 2011, 2013; Goldberg et al., 2013; Mahon et al., 2013; Takahara et al., 2013; Tr eguier et al., 2014).”
Environmental DNA monitoring and management of invasive fish: comparison of eDNA and fyke netting (2017, methodology): “Recently, environmental DNA (eDNA) has been used to detect a number of invasive fish including the bluegill sunfish, Mozambique tilapia, and Asian carp (Dejean et al. 2012; Jerde et al. 2013; Robson et al. 2016; Takahara et al. 2013).”
From eDNA to citizen science: emerging tools for the early detection of invasive species (2020, methodology): “There has been a marked rise in the application of eDNA approaches to invasive species surveillance across freshwater, marine, and terrestrial ecosystems over the past decade (Jerde et al. 2013; Barnes and Turner 2015; Valentin et al. 2018).”
Risk Analysis and Bioeconomics of Invasive Species to Inform Policy and Management (2016, background): “As in medicine, cost savings from prevention are driving increased interest in building regional and national invasive species surveillance programs (106, 107).”
Taxonomic and geographical representation of freshwater environmental DNA research in aquatic conservation (2019, background): “The lentic habitat diversity ranged from phytothelmata (Brozio et al., 2017) and small ponds (Mauvisseau et al., 2018) to the North American Great Lakes in the USA and Canada (Jerde et al., 2013), and artificial and highly impaired freshwater reservoirs in Singapore (Lim et al., 2016).”
Replication levels, false presences and the estimation of the presence/absence from eDNA metabarcoding data (2015, background): “…biodiversity and/or envi- ronmental changes (Jorgensen et al. 2012; Parducci et al. 2013; Boessenkool et al. 2014; Giguet-Covex et al. 2014; Willerslev et al. 2014) and environmental monitoring (Jerde et al. 2011, 2013; Hajibabaei et al. 2012; Darling 2014; Mahon et al. 2014; Nathan et al. 2014).”