Statistical determination of diagnostic species for site groups of unequal size
By L. Tichý, Milan Chytrý. 2006
543 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Ecological Modeling, Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Nature and Landscape Conservation
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/3c0463cccb688665232a8ebfbedc41add0104084
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Ecological Modeling
In Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
In Nature and Landscape Conservation
Citations in the corpus
- Using tree species inventories to map biomes and assess their climatic overlaps in lowland tropical South America (2018, methodology): “In order to determine the biome affiliation of species, we used a modified version of the phi coefficient of Tichy & Chytrý (2006) that leverages presence/absence data and accounts for variation in sampling amongst groups.”
- Improving indicator species analysis by combining groups of sites (2010, methodology): “Tsiripidis et al. (2009) recently addressed the same issue, proposing an algorithm that considers the possible association of the species with more than one group of sites.”
- Dissecting a biodiversity hotspot: The importance of environmentally marginal habitats in the Atlantic Forest Domain of South America (2017, methodology): “…emerging from the community turnover models to create site groups discriminating the marginal habitats and then processed the species matrix following the procedure proposed by Tichý and Chytrý (2006) to produce sets of diagnostic species, which are provided as supporting information (Table S2).”
- Assessing species diagnostic value in large data sets: A comparison between phi-coefficient and Ochiai index (2008, methodology): “…relevé vegetation databases (Brisse et al. 1995; Ewald 2002; Font 2007; Hennekens & Schaminée 2001), diagnostic species and the objective measurement of fidelity have become a major research topic (Botta-Dukát & Borhidi 1999; Bruelheide 2000; Chytrý et al. 2002b; Tichý 2005; Tichý & Chytrý 2006).”
- Distinct soil microbial diversity under long-term organic and conventional farming (2014, methodology): “, 2010) and correction for unequal sample sizes where necessary (Tichy et al., 2006).”
- Regional species pools of vascular plants in habitats of the Czech Republic (2007, unknown): “Then, the percentage occurrence frequency and fidelity (according to Tichý & Chytrý 2006) of each species to each habitat, based on the relevé data, were calculated using the JUICE 6.4 program (Tichý 2002).”
- Associations between species and groups of sites: indices and statistical inference. (2009, methodology): “…g ind. MIQUEL DE CÁCERES AND PIERRE LEGENDRE3568 Ecology, Vol. 90, No. 12 An alternative modification of rU, which we will not include in our framework, consists in fixing the relative size of the target group to an arbitrary user-defined parameter (Knollová et al. 2005, Tichý and Chytrý 2006).”
- Diversity of Central European urban biota: effects of human‐made habitat types on plants and land snails (2011, methodology): “Statistical significance of the species–habitat associations, quantified by U, was assessed with Fisher’s exact test (P 0.05) following Tichý & Chytrý (2006).”
- Pladias Database of the Czech flora and vegetation (2021, methodology): “Fidelity was measured using the phi coefficient of association after the sizes of plot groups were virtually standardized to 1% of the total size of the data set following Tichý & Chytrý (2006).”