Diversity of Central European urban biota: effects of human‐made habitat types on plants and land snails

114 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Changes in wild bee fauna of a grassland in Brazil reveal negative effects associated with growing urbanization during the last 40 years (2013, background): “Within urban areas, habitat type is a very important influence on species composition, with residential areas and urban peripheries richer in species than city centers (LOSOSOVÁ et al. 2011).”
Informal urban green space: A trilingual systematic review of its role for biodiversity and trends in the literature (2015, unknown): “They could also play a role in coordinating future research efforts in their regions, or collaborate for cross-regional and cross-cultural studies as follow-ups to emerging cross-national studies (e.g., Lososová et al., 2011).”
Native and alien floras in urban habitats: a comparison across 32 cities of central Europe (2012, background): “Our results indicate that urban habitat types and the specific disturbance regimes associated with each of them strongly affect species composition (Celesti-Grapow et al., 2006; Godefroid & Koedam, 2007; Lososová et al., 2011).”
Prevalence of alien versus native species of woody plants in Berlin differs between habitats and at different scales. (2013, background): “(iv) To determine whether the occurrence of species in different urban habitats is uneven (Lososová et al. 2011), we assessed the number and frequency of woody species in five major urban habitats for which we calculated the percentage of alien species (v).”