Habitats selected by Grizzly Bears in a multiple use landscape
By Bruce N. McLellan, F. Hovey. 2001
157 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Ecological Modeling, Ecology
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/3bd8b4d807b7e8d8847a449f3ac4e6edb4eae522
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Ecological Modeling
- Bruce N. McLellan
- M. Boyce
- Gordon B. Stenhouse
- Mark Hebblewhite
- Scott E. Nielsen
- Gregory J. McDermid
- M. Proctor
- Jacqui Frair
In Ecology
- Bruce N. McLellan
- Gordon B. Stenhouse
- M. Boyce
- Scott E. Nielsen
- John Boulanger
- Mark Hebblewhite
- M. Proctor
- Gregory J. McDermid
Citations in the corpus
- Some mechanisms underlying variation in vital rates of grizzly bears on a multiple use landscape (2015, methodology): “…that bears consume when they deposit fat required for hibernation and reproduction (McLellan 2011) provided opportunity to test the hypothesis that this energy food and the early-seral, post-fire habitats (McLellan and Hovey 2001a) where they occur limit bear populations by affecting recruitment.”
- A habitat-based framework for grizzly bear conservation in Alberta (2006, unknown): “…proved high to very high in average safe-harbour values, consistent with previous regional habitat assessments promoting secure open herbaceous areas and open forested conditions (Hamer and Herrero, 1987; Hamer et al., 1991; McLellan and Hovey, 2001; Nielsen et al., 2002, 2003; Theberge, 2002).”
- ESTIMATING GRIZZLY BEAR DISTRIBUTION AND ABUNDANCE RELATIVE TO HABITAT AND HUMAN INFLUENCE (2004, background): “Areas burned by wildfire often are highly preferred due to high berry production (Hamer and Herrero 1987; McLellan and Hovey 2001a) and were positively associated with grizzly bear detection at broader scales in our study area.”
- Application of random effects to the study of resource selection by animals. (2006, background): “…functions include glme and glmmPQL, and glmmML, glmm, Grizzly (brown) bears are a species of conservation concern across the circumpolar north, and as a result their resource selection patterns have frequently been the subject of applied research (e.g. McLellan & Hovey 2001; Nielsen et al .”
- Implications of a high-energy and low-protein diet on the body composition, fitness, and competitive abilities of black (Ursus americanus) and grizzly (Ursus arctos) bears (2011, methodology): “Both study areas had large wildfires during the past century, and some of the upper elevation, once forested areas had not yet regenerated to conifers; these relatively open areas are where huckleberries were abundant (McLellan and Hovey 2001; Apps et al. 2004).”
- Population-level resource selection by sympatric brown and American black bears in Alaska (2009, background): “Because habitat use by brown and black bears has been shown to be seasonal (Beecham and Rohlman 1994; McLellan and Hovey 2001; McLoughlin et al. 2002), the number of locations of each bear in each cell was calculated separately for each season.”
- Grizzly bears and forestry II. Distribution of grizzly bear foods in clearcuts of west-central Alberta, Canada (2004, background): “Loss of early seral forests and natural openings has the potential to cause population declines in bears (Beecham, 1980, 1983; Irwin and Hammond, 1985; Lindzey et al., 1986; Noyce and Coy, 1989; McLellan and Hovey, 2001).”
- SAMPLING DESIGN AND BIAS IN DNA-BASED CAPTURE–MARK–RECAPTURE POPULATION AND DENSITY ESTIMATES OF GRIZZLY BEARS (2004, methodology): “First, the small size of cubs (bears <1 yr-of-age) in relation to barbed wire height at hair-traps may lead to undersampling these bears (Woods et al. 1999).”
- Evolutionary and ecological traps for brown bears Ursus arctos in human‐modified landscapes (2018, background): “In the absence of humans, consuming high- energy berries benefits bears’ fitness (Welch et al. 1997, McLellan 2011, McLellan 2015), thus berries are attractive for them (McLellan and Hovey 2001, Nielsen et al. 2003, Nielsen et al. 2010).”
- MOOSE CALVING STRATEGIES IN INTERIOR MONTANE ECOSYSTEMS (2007, methodology): “All have experienced significant industrial timber harvesting over the past 50 years, and had moderate to high densities of wolves (Hayes and Gunson 1995), grizzly bears (U. arctos, Flathead Valley ;44/1,000 km2; Upper Elk Valley and Spillimacheen Valley: ;24/1,000 km2—Mowat et al. 2005), and likely”
- Sexually selected infanticide in grizzly bears: the effects of hunting on cub survival (2005, background): “In the Flathead hunted area, sex and age class did not have a significant effect on habitat selection by grizzly bears (McLellan and Hovey 2001a).”
- SEASONAL AND DIEL PATTERNS OF GRIZZLY BEAR DIET AND ACTIVITY IN WEST-CENTRAL ALBERTA (2006, background): “…use has been widely documented within the Central Rockies of Canada (Apps et al. 2004; Gibeau 1998; Hamer and Herrero 1987; Hamer et al. 1991; McLellan and Hovey 2001; Mueller et al. 2004; Nielsen et al. 2002, 2003, * Correspondent: robin_munro2002@yahoo.ca 2006 American Society of…”
- Dynamic wildlife habitat models: Seasonal foods and mortality risk predict occupancy-abundance and habitat selection in grizzly bears (2010, methodology): “…al., 2002), facilitated by geographic information systems (GIS) and advances in telemetry, have been used extensively over the past decade to model habitat conditions for bears (e.g., Mace et al., 1999; McLellan and Hovey, 2001; Nielsen et al., 2003, 2004c, 2006; Ciarniello et al., 2007a, 2007b).”