Some mechanisms underlying variation in vital rates of grizzly bears on a multiple use landscape

92 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Berry production drives bottom – up effects on body mass and reproductive success in an omnivore (2018, background): “To date there is limited information on how climate aff ects omnivores that rely on higher-quality plant forage, such as berries, and for a limited period of time (but see McLellan and Hovey 1995, McLellan 2011, 2015).”
Effects of habitat quality and access management on the density of a recovering grizzly bear population (2018, methodology): “McLellan (2015) suggested little impact of increasing road density in F IGURE 3 (a) Predicted responses of the most supported model illustrating the positive relationship between habitat quality and grizzly bear density (with Road Density fixed to >0.6 km/km2, reflecting most of the landscape).”
Evolutionary and ecological traps for brown bears Ursus arctos in human‐modified landscapes (2018, background): “Even in the lower 48 states of the USA, numbers of brown bears are increasing outside protected areas, and it is expected that in future, bear distribution will largely overlap with humanmodified landscapes (McLellan 2015).”