Is there a universal positivity bias in attributions? A meta-analytic review of individual, developmental, and cultural differences in the self-serving attributional bias.
By A. Mezulis, L. Abramson, Janet S. Hyde, Benjamin L. Hankin. Psychological bulletin, 2004
1,273 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Applied Psychology, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Social Psychology
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/3b34c66b49c43d2fb28f2764603c5543dadda839
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Applied Psychology
- Constantine Sedikides
- T. Wildschut
- Ara Norenzayan
- M. Alicke
- C. Routledge
- Jamie Arndt
- Niels Van Quaquebeke
- Rolf van Dick
In Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
- Joseph Henrich
- Steven J. Heine
- Ara Norenzayan
- M. Alicke
- Niels Van Quaquebeke
- Rolf van Dick
- Constantine Sedikides
- Jamie Arndt
In Social Psychology
- Constantine Sedikides
- T. Wildschut
- C. Routledge
- Jamie Arndt
- Joseph Henrich
- Ara Norenzayan
- Matthew Vess
- Steven J. Heine
Citations in the corpus
- Exploring Causes of the Self‐serving Bias (2008, background): “Instead, they show a weaker self-serving bias than do people with positive self-schema (Mezulis et al., 2004).”
- Nostalgia as a Resource for the Self (2012, result): “Consistent with previous research (Campbell & Sedikides, 1999; Mezulis et al., 2004), participants in the failure condition attributed their performance less to their ability than those in the success condition.”