Emergence of Features in Metaphor Comprehension

By M. Gineste, Bipin Indurkhya, Veronique Scart. 2000

109 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Social Psychology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/3b0504dbb38d9d0461e065c977caf0ed4378b42e

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

1. Deirdre Wilson
2. Robyn Carston
3. Gerard Steen
4. Raymond W. Gibbs Jr.
5. Elly Ifantidou
6. Dan Sperber
7. Michael Haugh
8. T. Wharton

In Social Psychology

1. Uri Hasson
2. Deirdre Wilson
3. Caroline Willners
4. Carita Paradis

Citations in the corpus

• The Way We Think: Conceptual Blending and the Mind''s Hidden Complexities. Basic Books (2002, background): “Black’s interaction theory has often been criticized for being vague and imprecise, but its theoretical aptness and applicability were convincingly demonstrated by Indurkhya (Indurkhya, 1991, 1992; Gineste et al., 2000; see also Forceville, 1995).”
• Does understanding negation entail affirmation?: An examination of negated metaphors (2006, background): “In fact, metaphorical interpretations often include emergent features that are not shared by either the metaphor topic or vehicle (e.g., sneakily illicit for the lawyer-shark metaphor; cf. Bekker, 1997; Gineste et al., 2000; Tourengeau and Rips, 1991).”
• Metaphor, relevance and the 'emergent property' issue (2006, background): “This is true both for poetic metaphors (Gineste et al., 2000) and for more prosaic everyday cases such as (10): (10) Men are wolves.”